↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN731^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:41:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.07s 2.06s
% Output   : Refutation 3.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (   9   ~;   1   |;   1   &;  62   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   2   ^;  23   !;  12   ?;  38   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(cP_decl,type,
    cP: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( ^ [A: $i,B: $i] :
        @+[C: $i] : ( cP @ B @ A @ C ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ! [B: $i] :
        ? [C: $i] : ( cP @ A @ B @ C )
     => ? [B: $i] : ( cP @ B @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cX2150) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
          ? [C: $i] : ( cP @ A @ B @ C )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( cP @ B @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ? [A: $i] :
        ( ! [B: $i] :
          ? [C: $i] : ( cP @ A @ B @ C )
       => ? [B: $i] : ( cP @ B @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ? [C: $i] : ( cP @ A @ B @ C )
     => ? [A: $i,B: $i] : ( cP @ B @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cP @ A @ B @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) )
      & ~ ( cP @ D @ D @ C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( cP @ A @ B @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( cP @ B @ B @ A ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( cP @ B @ B @ A ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ $true
      | ( ( cP @ A @ B @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) )
       != ( cP @ D @ D @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[6,8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( cP @ A @ B @ ( sk1 @ B @ A ) )
     != ( cP @ D @ D @ C ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[10:[bind(A,$thf( F )),bind(B,$thf( F )),bind(C,$thf( sk1 @ F @ F )),bind(D,$thf( F ))]]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN731^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:23:07 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.85/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.17/0.96  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (180ms). 
% 1.17/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.73/1.37  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.73/1.38  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.89/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.05/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.05/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.05/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.05/1.51  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.07/2.05  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.07/2.06  % Time passed: 1713ms (effective reasoning time: 1074ms)
% 3.07/2.06  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.07/2.06  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.07/2.06  % No. of inferences in proof: 11
% 3.07/2.06  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1713 ms resp. 1074 ms w/o parsing
% 3.07/2.11  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.07/2.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------