%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN732+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:56:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.31s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% Number of literals : 5 ( 0 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
p(esk2_1(X1),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-br9einty/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ p(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-br9einty/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
p(esk2_1(X1),X1),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ p(X1,X2),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYN732+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:41:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.31/2.40 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.31/2.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.31/2.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.31/2.40 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S0V
% 8.31/2.40 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
% 8.31/2.40 #
% 8.31/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 8.31/2.40
% 8.31/2.40 # Proof found!
% 8.31/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.31/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.31/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.31/2.40
% 8.31/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.31/2.40 # User time : 0.022 s
% 8.31/2.40 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.31/2.40 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 8.31/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.31/2.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------