%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN733+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:26:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 6 ~; 6 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 3 sgn 5 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(y2141,conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
? [X2] :
( ( q(X1)
| q(X2) )
& p(X1) )
=> ? [X3] :
( q(X3)
& p(X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',y2141) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] :
? [X2] :
( ( q(X1)
| q(X2) )
& p(X1) )
=> ? [X3] :
( q(X3)
& p(X3) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[y2141]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ q(X7)
| ~ p(X7) )
& ( q(X6)
| q(esk1_0) )
& p(X4) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1)
| q(esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1)
| ~ p(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
p(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
q(esk1_0),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ q(X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN733+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:16:14 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % sh5l with pid 1744904 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.54 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1744912 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.54 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.54 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.26/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.26/0.54 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.26/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Generated clauses : 3
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 212
% 0.26/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 78
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.54 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.54 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.26/0.54
% 0.26/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.54 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.54 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.26/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------