%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN760-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:36:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 1.72s 0.79s
% Output : Saturation 1.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_107ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_124ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
ssRr(X1,skf1(X1)),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_124,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssPv1(X4)
| ~ ssRr(X3,X4)
| ~ ssRr(X3,X1)
| ~ ssRr(X1,X2)
| ssPv3(X3)
| ssPv1(X3)
| ssPv3(X2) ),
c_0_107,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_353,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssPv1(skf1(X1))
| ssPv4(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_335,c_0_330]),c_0_311]),c_0_340]),c_0_347]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_374,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssPv1(X1)
| ~ ssPv1(skf1(X1))
| ssPv2(skf1(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_306,c_0_315]),c_0_311]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_456,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssPv1(skf1(X1))
| ssPv4(skf1(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_452,c_0_453]),c_0_454]),c_0_353]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_460,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssPv1(skf1(X1))
| ssPv3(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_459,c_0_330]),c_0_311]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_478,negated_conjecture,
~ ssPv4(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_473,c_0_463]),c_0_468]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_484,negated_conjecture,
~ ssPv3(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_478,c_0_479]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_488,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssRr(X3,X1)
| ~ ssRr(X2,X3)
| ~ ssPv1(X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_483,c_0_45]),c_0_484]),c_0_484]),c_0_478]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_492,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssRr(skf1(X2),X1)
| ~ ssPv1(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_488,c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_495,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssPv1(X1)
| ssPv3(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_462,c_0_443]),c_0_491]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_496,negated_conjecture,
~ ssPv1(skf1(skf1(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_492,c_0_45]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_497,negated_conjecture,
~ ssPv2(X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_493,c_0_494]),c_0_484]),c_0_484]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN760-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.43 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:15:34 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.72/0.79 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.72/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.72/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2433465 completed with status 1
% 1.72/0.79 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 1.72/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.72/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.72/0.79 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.72/0.79 % Search class: FGHNF-FSMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.72/0.79 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 184s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2433471 completed with status 1
% 1.72/0.79 % Result found by G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.72/0.79 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.72/0.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.72/0.79 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.72/0.79 % Search class: FGHNF-FSMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 1.72/0.79 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Starting G-E--_208_C47_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 184s (1) cores
% 1.72/0.79 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 1.72/0.79 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.72/0.79
% 1.72/0.79 % No proof found!
% 1.72/0.79 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 1.72/0.79 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 1.72/0.79 % Parsed axioms : 51
% 1.72/0.79 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Initial clauses : 51
% 1.72/0.79 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 1.72/0.79 % Processed clauses : 1669
% 1.72/0.79 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % ...subsumed : 969
% 1.72/0.79 % ...remaining for further processing : 700
% 1.72/0.79 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Backward-subsumed : 637
% 1.72/0.79 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Generated clauses : 4688
% 1.72/0.79 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2417
% 1.72/0.79 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 269
% 1.72/0.79 % Paramodulations : 4688
% 1.72/0.79 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % NegExts : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % ...of those cached : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.72/0.79 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.72/0.79 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.72/0.79 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.72/0.79 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.72/0.79 % Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 1.72/0.79 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 1.72/0.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 1.72/0.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 1.72/0.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.72/0.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 687
% 1.72/0.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12023
% 1.72/0.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6274
% 1.72/0.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1729
% 1.72/0.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 178
% 1.72/0.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.72/0.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 99892
% 1.72/0.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 318
% 1.72/0.79
% 1.72/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.72/0.79 % User time : 0.255 s
% 1.72/0.79 % System time : 0.004 s
% 1.72/0.79 % Total time : 0.259 s
% 1.72/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
% 1.72/0.79
% 1.72/0.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.72/0.79 % User time : 1.202 s
% 1.72/0.79 % System time : 0.025 s
% 1.72/0.79 % Total time : 1.227 s
% 1.72/0.79 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1.72/0.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------