%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : E---3.5.1 % Problem : SYN916-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:30:32 PM UTC 2026 % Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.42s % Output : Saturation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN916-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:31:16 UTC 2026 % 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving % 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1 % 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.14/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % new_bool_1 with pid 4174042 completed with status 1 % 0.14/0.42 % Result found by new_bool_1 % 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.14/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) % 0.14/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) % 0.14/0.42 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN % 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total) % 0.14/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4174045 completed with status 1 % 0.14/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack % 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.14/0.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)) % 0.14/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0) % 0.14/0.42 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN % 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total) % 0.14/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores % 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s % 0.14/0.42 % 0.14/0.42 % No proof found! % 0.14/0.42 % SZS status Satisfiable % 0.14/0.42 % SZS output start Saturation % 0.14/0.42 % SZS output end Saturation % 0.14/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 1 % 0.14/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Initial clauses : 1 % 0.14/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 % 0.14/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Processed clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Generated clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Paramodulations : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Factorizations : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % NegExts : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 % 0.14/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 % 0.14/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 % 0.14/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 % 0.14/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 % 0.14/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 % 0.14/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5 % 0.14/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 0 % 0.14/0.42 % 0.14/0.42 % ------------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.42 % User time : 0.002 s % 0.14/0.42 % System time : 0.000 s % 0.14/0.42 % Total time : 0.002 s % 0.14/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3608 pages % 0.14/0.42 % 0.14/0.42 % ------------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.42 % User time : 0.003 s % 0.14/0.42 % System time : 0.004 s % 0.14/0.42 % Total time : 0.008 s % 0.14/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages % 0.14/0.42 % E exiting %------------------------------------------------------------------------------