%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN918+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:07:21 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 0.52s 0.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN918+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 20:26:38 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.52/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.52/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.52/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.52/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.52/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.52/0.59 % 0.52/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.52/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.52/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 % File : SYN918+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.52/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.52/0.60 % Problem : From Smullyan % 0.52/0.60 % Version : Especial. % 0.52/0.60 % English : % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Refs : [Smu68] Smullyan (1968), First-Order Logic % 0.52/0.60 % [Shu04] Shults (2004), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.52/0.60 % Source : [Shu04] % 0.52/0.60 % Names : % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Status : Theorem % 0.52/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v8.1.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0 % 0.52/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ) % 0.52/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 15 avg) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of connectives : 16 ( 2 ~; 1 |; 6 &) % 0.52/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 0.52/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 8 avg) % 0.52/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.52/0.60 % Number of variables : 6 ( 4 !; 2 ?) % 0.52/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 % Comments : % 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 fof(prove_this,conjecture, % 0.52/0.60 ( ( ! [X] : % 0.52/0.60 ( ( ( f(X) % 0.52/0.60 & g(X) ) % 0.52/0.60 => h(X) ) % 0.52/0.60 => ? [Y] : % 0.52/0.60 ( f(Y) % 0.52/0.60 & ~ g(Y) ) ) % 0.52/0.60 & ( ! [W] : % 0.52/0.60 ( f(W) % 0.52/0.60 => g(W) ) % 0.52/0.60 | ! [Z] : % 0.52/0.60 ( f(Z) % 0.52/0.60 => h(Z) ) ) ) % 0.52/0.60 => ( ! [R] : % 0.52/0.60 ( ( f(R) % 0.52/0.60 & h(R) ) % 0.52/0.60 => g(R) ) % 0.52/0.60 => ? [V] : % 0.52/0.60 ( f(V) % 0.52/0.60 & g(V) % 0.52/0.60 & ~ h(V) ) ) ) ). % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 % Proof found % 0.52/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.52/0.60 % SZS output start Proof % 0.52/0.60 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.52/0.60 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:8) % 0.52/0.60 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.52/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.52/0.60 %SharedTerms:3 % 0.52/0.60 %goalClause: 1 3 4 6 7 8 9 % 0.52/0.60 [1]P1(x11)+P1(a1) % 0.52/0.60 [3]P1(x31)+~P2(a1) % 0.52/0.60 [4]P2(x41)+~P2(a1) % 0.52/0.60 [6]~P3(x61)+~P2(a1) % 0.52/0.60 [7]~P1(x71)+~P3(x71)+P2(x71) % 0.52/0.60 [8]~P1(x81)+~P2(x81)+P3(x81) % 0.52/0.60 [9]~P1(x92)+~P1(x91)+P2(x91)+P3(x92) % 0.52/0.60 %EqnAxiom % 0.52/0.60 % 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/0.60 cnf(10,plain, % 0.52/0.60 (P1(a1)), % 0.52/0.60 inference(factoring_inference,[],[1])). % 0.52/0.60 cnf(12,plain, % 0.52/0.60 (P3(a1)+~P2(a1)), % 0.52/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,4,8])). % 0.52/0.60 cnf(13,plain, % 0.52/0.60 (~P2(a1)), % 0.52/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,12])). % 0.52/0.60 cnf(16,plain, % 0.52/0.60 ($false), % 0.52/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,13,9,7]), % 0.52/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.52/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.52/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------