↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN918+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:43:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  125 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   22 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  156 (  54   ~;  56   |;  32   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   3 sgn  28   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ( ( ( ! [Z] :
            ( f(Z)
           => h(Z) )
        | ! [W] :
            ( f(W)
           => g(W) ) )
      & ! [X] :
          ( ( ( g(X)
              & f(X) )
           => h(X) )
         => ? [Y] :
              ( ~ g(Y)
              & f(Y) ) ) )
   => ( ! [R] :
          ( ( h(R)
            & f(R) )
         => g(R) )
     => ? [V] :
          ( ~ h(V)
          & g(V)
          & f(V) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( ! [Z] :
              ( f(Z)
             => h(Z) )
          | ! [W] :
              ( f(W)
             => g(W) ) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( ( ( g(X)
                & f(X) )
             => h(X) )
           => ? [Y] :
                ( ~ g(Y)
                & f(Y) ) ) )
     => ( ! [R] :
            ( ( h(R)
              & f(R) )
           => g(R) )
       => ? [V] :
            ( ~ h(V)
            & g(V)
            & f(V) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ! [V] :
        ( h(V)
        | ~ g(V)
        | ~ f(V) )
    & ! [R] :
        ( g(R)
        | ~ h(R)
        | ~ f(R) )
    & ( ! [Z] :
          ( h(Z)
          | ~ f(Z) )
      | ! [W] :
          ( g(W)
          | ~ f(W) ) )
    & ! [X] :
        ( ? [Y] :
            ( ~ g(Y)
            & f(Y) )
        | ( ~ h(X)
          & g(X)
          & f(X) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_this_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ! [V] :
        ( h(V)
        | ~ g(V)
        | ~ f(V) )
    & ! [R] :
        ( g(R)
        | ~ h(R)
        | ~ f(R) )
    & ( ! [Z] :
          ( h(Z)
          | ~ f(Z) )
      | ! [W] :
          ( g(W)
          | ~ f(W) ) )
    & ! [X] :
        ( ( ~ g(sK0(X))
          & f(sK0(X)) )
        | ( ~ h(X)
          & g(X)
          & f(X) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(Y,sK0(X))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( h(VAR_0)
        | ~ g(VAR_0)
        | ~ f(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( g(VAR_0)
        | ~ h(VAR_0)
        | ~ f(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( h(VAR_1)
        | ~ f(VAR_1)
        | g(VAR_0)
        | ~ f(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ g(sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ h(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( f(sK0(VAR_0))
        | ~ h(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ g(sK0(VAR_0))
        | g(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( f(sK0(VAR_0))
        | g(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ g(sK0(VAR_0))
        | f(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( f(sK0(VAR_0))
        | f(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( h(B)
    | ~ f(B)
    | g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ g(sK0(A))
    | ~ h(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( g(A)
    | ~ h(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( h(A)
    | ~ g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ g(sK0(A))
    | ~ g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ f(A)
    | g(B)
    | ~ f(B)
    | g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_2]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( g(B)
    | ~ f(B)
    | g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_9]) ).

cnf(c_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ g(sK0(A))
    | f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(sK0(A))
    | f(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_29,plain,
    ( g(A)
    | g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_10]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( g(A)
    | ~ f(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_29]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( f(A)
    | g(sK0(A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( f(A)
    | f(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_15]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    f(A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    g(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ g(sK0(A))
    | ~ g(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ g(sK0(A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN918+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:45:18 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 1417063 was started by sandbox on n017,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 18:45:18 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.37  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.13/0.37  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.13/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.13/0.37  % Given clauses 10.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------