↑ Up

Bliksem---1.12.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : SYN919+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 02:58:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.74s 1.12s
% Output   : Refutation 0.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SYN919+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:11:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.74/1.12  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.74/1.12  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.74/1.12  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.74/1.12  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Clauses:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  { ! r( X, Y ), r( Y, X ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  { ! r( X, Z ), ! r( Z, Y ), r( X, Y ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  { ! r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  percentage equality = 0.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.74/1.12  This is a near-Horn, non-equality  problem
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Options Used:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  useres =            1
% 0.74/1.12  useparamod =        0
% 0.74/1.12  useeqrefl =         0
% 0.74/1.12  useeqfact =         0
% 0.74/1.12  usefactor =         1
% 0.74/1.12  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.74/1.12  usesimpdemod =      0
% 0.74/1.12  usesimpres =        4
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.74/1.12  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.74/1.12  substype =          standard
% 0.74/1.12  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.74/1.12  selectoldest =      5
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.74/1.12  litorderings [1] =  liftord
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  termordering =      none
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  litapriori =        1
% 0.74/1.12  termapriori =       0
% 0.74/1.12  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.74/1.12  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.74/1.12  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.74/1.12  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  litselect =         negative
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  maxweight =         30000
% 0.74/1.12  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.74/1.12  maxlength =         115
% 0.74/1.12  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.74/1.12  excuselevel =       0
% 0.74/1.12  increasemaxweight = 0
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.74/1.12  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  showgenerated =    0
% 0.74/1.12  showkept =         0
% 0.74/1.12  showselected =     0
% 0.74/1.12  showdeleted =      0
% 0.74/1.12  showresimp =       1
% 0.74/1.12  showstatus =       2000
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  prologoutput =     0
% 0.74/1.12  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.74/1.12  totalproof =       1
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  !  [4, 1]      (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  r  [37, 2]      (w:1, o:40, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  skol1  [39, 0]      (w:1, o:9, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.74/1.12  skol2  [40, 0]      (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Starting Search:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.74/1.12  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.74/1.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  (0) {G0,W7,D2,L2,V2,M1} I { r( Y, X ), ! r( X, Y ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (1) {G0,W11,D2,L3,V3,M1} I { ! r( X, Z ), r( X, Y ), ! r( Z, Y ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (2) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (3) {G0,W4,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (4) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(0,2) { r( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (5) {G2,W7,D2,L2,V1,M1} R(1,4) { r( X, skol1 ), ! r( X, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (7) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(5,2);r(3) {  }.
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.74/1.12  found a proof!
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  (9) {G0,W7,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! r( X, Y ), r( Y, X ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (10) {G0,W11,D2,L3,V3,M3}  { ! r( X, Z ), ! r( Z, Y ), r( X, Y ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (11) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  (12) {G0,W4,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Total Proof:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (0) {G0,W7,D2,L2,V2,M1} I { r( Y, X ), ! r( X, Y ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (9) {G0,W7,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! r( X, Y ), r( Y, X ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12     X := X
% 0.74/1.12     Y := Y
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12     0 ==> 1
% 0.74/1.12     1 ==> 0
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (1) {G0,W11,D2,L3,V3,M1} I { ! r( X, Z ), r( X, Y ), ! r( Z, Y
% 0.74/1.12     ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (10) {G0,W11,D2,L3,V3,M3}  { ! r( X, Z ), ! r( Z, Y ), r( X, Y )
% 0.74/1.12     }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12     X := X
% 0.74/1.12     Y := Y
% 0.74/1.12     Z := Z
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12     0 ==> 0
% 0.74/1.12     1 ==> 2
% 0.74/1.12     2 ==> 1
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (2) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (11) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12     0 ==> 0
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (3) {G0,W4,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (12) {G0,W4,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12     0 ==> 0
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  resolution: (16) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { r( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0[1]: (0) {G0,W7,D2,L2,V2,M1} I { r( Y, X ), ! r( X, Y ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent1[0]: (2) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12     X := skol1
% 0.74/1.12     Y := skol2
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  substitution1:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (4) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(0,2) { r( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (16) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { r( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12     0 ==> 0
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  resolution: (18) {G1,W7,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! r( X, skol2 ), r( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0[2]: (1) {G0,W11,D2,L3,V3,M1} I { ! r( X, Z ), r( X, Y ), ! r( Z, Y
% 0.74/1.12     ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent1[0]: (4) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} R(0,2) { r( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12     X := X
% 0.74/1.12     Y := skol1
% 0.74/1.12     Z := skol2
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  substitution1:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (5) {G2,W7,D2,L2,V1,M1} R(1,4) { r( X, skol1 ), ! r( X, skol2
% 0.74/1.12     ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (18) {G1,W7,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! r( X, skol2 ), r( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12     X := X
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12     0 ==> 1
% 0.74/1.12     1 ==> 0
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  resolution: (19) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0[1]: (5) {G2,W7,D2,L2,V1,M1} R(1,4) { r( X, skol1 ), ! r( X, skol2 )
% 0.74/1.12     }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent1[0]: (2) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { r( skol1, skol2 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12     X := skol1
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  substitution1:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  resolution: (20) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0[0]: (3) {G0,W4,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent1[0]: (19) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { r( skol1, skol1 ) }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  substitution1:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsumption: (7) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} R(5,2);r(3) {  }.
% 0.74/1.12  parent0: (20) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.74/1.12  substitution0:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  permutation0:
% 0.74/1.12  end
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Proof check complete!
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Memory use:
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  space for terms:        121
% 0.74/1.12  space for clauses:      392
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  clauses generated:      10
% 0.74/1.12  clauses kept:           8
% 0.74/1.12  clauses selected:       6
% 0.74/1.12  clauses deleted:        0
% 0.74/1.12  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  subsentry:          13
% 0.74/1.12  literals s-matched: 8
% 0.74/1.12  literals matched:   8
% 0.74/1.12  full subsumption:   4
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  checksum:           585
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  
% 0.74/1.12  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------