↑ Up

JavaRes---1.3.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : JavaRes---1.3.0
% Problem  : SYN919+1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xmx15G -cp /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin atp.ProverFOF -i /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark --eqax --proof --forward-subsumption --backward_subsumption --delete-tautologies --timeout 0 %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 18:31:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SYN919+1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : java -Xmx15G -cp /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin atp.ProverFOF -i /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark --eqax --proof --forward-subsumption --backward_subsumption --delete-tautologies --timeout 0 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer   : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUModel   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % RAMPerCPU  : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Mar 10 17:19:51 EST 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  # Using default include path : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark
% 0.20/0.49  # INFO in ProverFOF.main(): Processing file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49  # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): filename: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49  # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): opts: {backward_subsumption=true, delete-tautologies=true, filename=/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p, forward-subsumption=true, proof=true, eqax=true, timeout=0}
% 0.20/0.49  # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): evals: [Heuristics: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval] litSelect: LARGEST indexing: true delTaut: true forSub: true backSub: true]
% 0.20/0.54  # hasConjecture: true isFOF: true
% 0.20/0.54  # ProofState(): heuristics: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval]
% 0.20/0.54  # HeuristicsClauseSet using eval functions: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval]
% 0.55/0.57  # -----------------
% 0.55/0.57  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.57  
% 0.55/0.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.57  fof(prove_this,conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X))))),input).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((~r(X,Y)|~r(Y,Z))|r(X,Z))))))&(?[X]:(?[Y]:(r(X,Y)&~r(X,X))))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(?[VAR6]:(?[VAR5]:(r(VAR6,VAR5)&~r(VAR6,VAR6))))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))&((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2)))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.55/0.57  cnf(cnf3,negated_conjecture,~r(skf7,skf7),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(prove_this,conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X))))),input).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((~r(X,Y)|~r(Y,Z))|r(X,Z))))))&(?[X]:(?[Y]:(r(X,Y)&~r(X,X))))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(?[VAR6]:(?[VAR5]:(r(VAR6,VAR5)&~r(VAR6,VAR6))))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))&((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2)))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.55/0.57  cnf(cnf2,negated_conjecture,r(skf7,skf8),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(prove_this,conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X))))),input).
% 0.55/0.57  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((~r(X,Y)|~r(Y,Z))|r(X,Z))))))&(?[X]:(?[Y]:(r(X,Y)&~r(X,X))))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(?[VAR6]:(?[VAR5]:(r(VAR6,VAR5)&~r(VAR6,VAR6))))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))&((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2)))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(cnf2,negated_conjecture,r(skf7,skf8),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(prove_this,conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X))))),input).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((~r(X,Y)|~r(Y,Z))|r(X,Z))))))&(?[X]:(?[Y]:(r(X,Y)&~r(X,X))))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(?[VAR6]:(?[VAR5]:(r(VAR6,VAR5)&~r(VAR6,VAR6))))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))&((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2)))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(cnf0,negated_conjecture,~r(X1,X2)|r(X2,X1),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(c0,plain,r(skf8,skf7),inference(resolution, status(thm), [cnf0, cnf2])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(prove_this,conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X))))),input).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((r(X,Y)&r(Y,Z))=>r(X,Z))))))=>(![X]:(![Y]:(r(X,Y)=>r(X,X)))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(![Y]:(~r(X,Y)|r(Y,X))))&(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:((~r(X,Y)|~r(Y,Z))|r(X,Z))))))&(?[X]:(?[Y]:(r(X,Y)&~r(X,X))))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(?[VAR6]:(?[VAR5]:(r(VAR6,VAR5)&~r(VAR6,VAR6))))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,(((![VAR1]:(![VAR0]:(~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))))&(![VAR4]:(![VAR3]:(![VAR2]:((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2))))))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.55/0.58  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(((~r(VAR1,VAR0)|r(VAR0,VAR1))&((~r(VAR4,VAR3)|~r(VAR3,VAR2))|r(VAR4,VAR2)))&(r(skf7,skf8)&~r(skf7,skf7))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(cnf1,negated_conjecture,~r(X3,X4)|~r(X4,X5)|r(X3,X5),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(c3,plain,~r(X7,skf8)|r(X7,skf7),inference(resolution, status(thm), [cnf1, c0])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(c5,plain,r(skf7,skf7),inference(resolution, status(thm), [c3, cnf2])).
% 0.55/0.58  cnf(c7,plain,$false,inference(resolution, status(thm), [c5, cnf3])).
% 0.55/0.58  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.58  # Filename           : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.58  # Indexed            : true
% 0.55/0.58  # Eval function name : PickGiven5
% 0.55/0.58  # Initial clauses    : 4
% 0.55/0.58  # Processed clauses  : 7
% 0.55/0.58  # Factors computed   : 1
% 0.55/0.58  # Resolvents computed: 8
% 0.55/0.58  # Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.55/0.58  # Forward subsumed   : 1
% 0.55/0.58  # Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.55/0.58  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.58  # SZS Expected       : Theorem
% 0.55/0.58  # time               : 32ms
% 0.55/0.58  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------