↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SYN920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:34:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.78s 1.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:49:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.78/1.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 8.78/1.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 8.78/1.60  fof(prove_this, conjecture, (((! [X0] : (((f(X0) & g(X0)) => h(X0))) => ? [X0] : ((f(X0) & ~g(X0)))) & (! [X1] : ((f(X1) => g(X1))) | ! [X2] : ((f(X2) => h(X2))))) => (! [X3] : (((f(X3) & h(X3)) => g(X3))) => ? [X4] : ((f(X4) & (g(X4) & ~h(X4))))))).
% 8.78/1.60  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~((((! [X0] : (((f(X0) & g(X0)) => h(X0))) => ? [X0] : ((f(X0) & ~g(X0)))) & (! [X1] : ((f(X1) => g(X1))) | ! [X2] : ((f(X2) => h(X2))))) => (! [X3] : (((f(X3) & h(X3)) => g(X3))) => ? [X4] : ((f(X4) & (g(X4) & ~h(X4))))))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [prove_this])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c0, plain, X0 | f(sK1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c1, plain, X0 | ~g(sK1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c2, plain, ~f(X0) | g(X0) | ~f(X1) | h(X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c3, plain, ~f(X0) | ~h(X0) | g(X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c4, plain, ~f(X0) | ~g(X0) | h(X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c5, plain, ~X0 | f(sK6), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c6, plain, ~X0 | g(sK6), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(c7, plain, ~X0 | ~h(sK6), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d0, plain, ~f(X0) | g(X0) | h(sK1) | 'Ts0', inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c2,c0])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d1, plain, 'Ts0' | g(sK1) | h(sK1) | 'Ts0', inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d0,c0])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d2, plain, ~f(sK6) | h(sK6) | ~'Ts0', inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c4,c6])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d3, plain, ~'Ts0' | h(sK6) | ~'Ts0', inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,c5])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d4, plain, ~'Ts0' | ~'Ts0', inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c7])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d5, plain, g(sK1) | h(sK1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,d1])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d6, plain, ~g(sK1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,c1])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d7, plain, h(sK1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d5])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d8, plain, ~f(sK1) | g(sK1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d7,c3])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d9, plain, f(sK1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,c0])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d10, plain, g(sK1), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d9,d8])).
% 8.78/1.60  cnf(d11, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d10])).
% 8.78/1.60  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------