↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SYN920+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:49:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN920+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed May  8 20:08:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.52  % Version:  1.5
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.52  fof(prove_this,conjecture,((((![X]:((f(X)&g(X))=>h(X)))=>(?[X]:(f(X)&(~g(X)))))&((![W]:(f(W)=>g(W)))|(![Z]:(f(Z)=>h(Z)))))=>((![R]:((f(R)&h(R))=>g(R)))=>(?[V]:((f(V)&g(V))&(~h(V)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_this)).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~((((![X]:((f(X)&g(X))=>h(X)))=>(?[X]:(f(X)&(~g(X)))))&((![W]:(f(W)=>g(W)))|(![Z]:(f(Z)=>h(Z)))))=>((![R]:((f(R)&h(R))=>g(R)))=>(?[V]:((f(V)&g(V))&(~h(V))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~((((![X]:((f(X)&g(X))=>h(X)))=>(?[X]:(f(X)&~g(X))))&((![W]:(f(W)=>g(W)))|(![Z]:(f(Z)=>h(Z)))))=>((![R]:((f(R)&h(R))=>g(R)))=>(?[V]:((f(V)&g(V))&~h(V)))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,((((?[X]:((f(X)&g(X))&~h(X)))|(?[X]:(f(X)&~g(X))))&((![W]:(~f(W)|g(W)))|(![Z]:(~f(Z)|h(Z)))))&((![R]:((~f(R)|~h(R))|g(R)))&(![V]:((~f(V)|~g(V))|h(V))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((((?[X2]:((f(X2)&g(X2))&~h(X2)))|(?[X3]:(f(X3)&~g(X3))))&((![X4]:(~f(X4)|g(X4)))|(![X5]:(~f(X5)|h(X5)))))&((![X6]:((~f(X6)|~h(X6))|g(X6)))&(![X7]:((~f(X7)|~g(X7))|h(X7))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X4]:(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:(((((f(skolem0001)&g(skolem0001))&~h(skolem0001))|(f(skolem0002)&~g(skolem0002)))&((~f(X4)|g(X4))|(~f(X5)|h(X5))))&(((~f(X6)|~h(X6))|g(X6))&((~f(X7)|~g(X7))|h(X7)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((((f(skolem0001)&g(skolem0001))&~h(skolem0001))|(f(skolem0002)&~g(skolem0002)))&((![X4]:(~f(X4)|g(X4)))|(![X5]:(~f(X5)|h(X5)))))&((![X6]:((~f(X6)|~h(X6))|g(X6)))&(![X7]:((~f(X7)|~g(X7))|h(X7))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(![X4]:(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:((((((f(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002))&(f(skolem0001)|~g(skolem0002)))&((g(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002))&(g(skolem0001)|~g(skolem0002))))&((~h(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002))&(~h(skolem0001)|~g(skolem0002))))&((~f(X4)|g(X4))|(~f(X5)|h(X5))))&(((~f(X6)|~h(X6))|g(X6))&((~f(X7)|~g(X7))|h(X7)))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,~h(skolem0001)|~g(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,~h(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,f(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,g(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c15,negated_conjecture,~f(X9)|~g(X9)|h(X9),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c16,plain,~f(skolem0001)|h(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c15, c9])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c24,plain,h(skolem0001)|f(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16, c7])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c29,plain,f(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c24, c11])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c14,negated_conjecture,~f(X8)|~h(X8)|g(X8),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c13,negated_conjecture,~f(X11)|g(X11)|~f(X10)|h(X10),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c17,plain,~f(X12)|g(X12)|h(X12),inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c13])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c33,plain,g(skolem0002)|h(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c29, c17])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c40,plain,g(skolem0002)|~f(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c33, c14])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c48,plain,g(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c40, c29])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c49,plain,~h(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c48, c12])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,f(skolem0001)|~g(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c51,plain,f(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c48, c8])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,g(skolem0001)|~g(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c50,plain,g(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c48, c10])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c53,plain,~f(skolem0001)|h(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c50, c15])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c56,plain,h(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c53, c51])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c57,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c56, c49])).
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  % Initial clauses    : 9
% 0.19/0.52  % Processed clauses  : 27
% 0.19/0.52  % Factors computed   : 1
% 0.19/0.52  % Resolvents computed: 42
% 0.19/0.52  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.19/0.52  % Forward subsumed   : 5
% 0.19/0.52  % Backward subsumed  : 16
% 0.19/0.52  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.19/0.52  % User time          : 0.165 s
% 0.19/0.52  % System time        : 0.020 s
% 0.19/0.52  % Total time         : 0.185 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------