↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYN920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:22:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   70 (   5 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  252 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  290 ( 108   ~; 112   |;  42   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  21  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (  10 usr;   8 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  36   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( f(X0)
              & g(X0) )
           => h(X0) )
       => ? [X0] :
            ( f(X0)
            & ~ g(X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X1] :
            ( f(X1)
           => g(X1) )
        | ! [X2] :
            ( f(X2)
           => h(X2) ) ) )
   => ( ! [X3] :
          ( ( f(X3)
            & h(X3) )
         => g(X3) )
     => ? [X4] :
          ( f(X4)
          & g(X4)
          & ~ h(X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( ! [X0] :
              ( ( f(X0)
                & g(X0) )
             => h(X0) )
         => ? [X0] :
              ( f(X0)
              & ~ g(X0) ) )
        & ( ! [X1] :
              ( f(X1)
             => g(X1) )
          | ! [X2] :
              ( f(X2)
             => h(X2) ) ) )
     => ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( f(X3)
              & h(X3) )
           => g(X3) )
       => ? [X4] :
            ( f(X4)
            & g(X4)
            & ~ h(X4) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ( ! [X0] :
              ( ( f(X0)
                & g(X0) )
             => h(X0) )
         => ? [X1] :
              ( f(X1)
              & ~ g(X1) ) )
        & ( ! [X2] :
              ( f(X2)
             => g(X2) )
          | ! [X3] :
              ( f(X3)
             => h(X3) ) ) )
     => ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( f(X4)
              & h(X4) )
           => g(X4) )
       => ? [X5] :
            ( f(X5)
            & g(X5)
            & ~ h(X5) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ! [X5] :
        ( ~ f(X5)
        | ~ g(X5)
        | h(X5) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( g(X4)
        | ~ f(X4)
        | ~ h(X4) )
    & ( ? [X1] :
          ( f(X1)
          & ~ g(X1) )
      | ? [X0] :
          ( ~ h(X0)
          & f(X0)
          & g(X0) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( g(X2)
          | ~ f(X2) )
      | ! [X3] :
          ( h(X3)
          | ~ f(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ! [X5] :
        ( ~ f(X5)
        | ~ g(X5)
        | h(X5) )
    & ! [X4] :
        ( g(X4)
        | ~ f(X4)
        | ~ h(X4) )
    & ( ? [X1] :
          ( f(X1)
          & ~ g(X1) )
      | ? [X0] :
          ( ~ h(X0)
          & f(X0)
          & g(X0) ) )
    & ( ! [X2] :
          ( g(X2)
          | ~ f(X2) )
      | ! [X3] :
          ( h(X3)
          | ~ f(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ f(X0)
        | ~ g(X0)
        | h(X0) )
    & ! [X1] :
        ( g(X1)
        | ~ f(X1)
        | ~ h(X1) )
    & ( ? [X2] :
          ( f(X2)
          & ~ g(X2) )
      | ? [X3] :
          ( ~ h(X3)
          & f(X3)
          & g(X3) ) )
    & ( ! [X4] :
          ( g(X4)
          | ~ f(X4) )
      | ! [X5] :
          ( h(X5)
          | ~ f(X5) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ f(X0)
        | ~ g(X0)
        | h(X0) )
    & ! [X1] :
        ( g(X1)
        | ~ f(X1)
        | ~ h(X1) )
    & ( ( f(sK0)
        & ~ g(sK0) )
      | ( ~ h(sK1)
        & f(sK1)
        & g(sK1) ) )
    & ( ! [X4] :
          ( g(X4)
          | ~ f(X4) )
      | ! [X5] :
          ( h(X5)
          | ~ f(X5) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X2,sK0),skolemize(X3,sK1)],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( g(X4)
      | ~ f(X4)
      | h(X5)
      | ~ f(X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ~ g(sK0)
    | g(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ~ g(sK0)
    | f(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( ~ g(sK0)
    | ~ h(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( f(sK0)
    | g(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( f(sK0)
    | f(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( f(sK0)
    | ~ h(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ h(X1)
      | ~ f(X1)
      | g(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ g(X0)
      | ~ f(X0)
      | h(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f18,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> h(sK1) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( h(sK1)
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ~ h(sK1)
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f22,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> g(sK0) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( ~ g(sK0)
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f11,f22,f18]) ).

fof(f27,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> g(sK1) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( g(sK1)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f9,f22,f27]) ).

fof(f32,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> f(sK0) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK0)
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( f(sK0)
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f12,f32,f27]) ).

fof(f37,definition,
    ( spl2_5
  <=> f(sK1) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1)
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( spl2_5
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f13,f32,f37]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1)
    | h(sK1)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f16,f29]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK1)
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f70,f20]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_5
    | spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f71,f27,f18,f37]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ( ~ g(sK0)
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f10,f38]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f79,f37,f22]) ).

fof(f82,definition,
    ( spl2_11
  <=> ! [X5] :
        ( h(X5)
        | ~ f(X5) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_11])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ( ! [X5] :
        ( ~ f(X5)
        | h(X5) )
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f85,definition,
    ( spl2_12
  <=> ! [X4] :
        ( g(X4)
        | ~ f(X4) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_12])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( ~ f(X4)
        | g(X4) )
    | ~ spl2_12 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( spl2_11
    | spl2_12 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f85,f82]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( h(sK0)
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f83,f34]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ( ~ f(sK0)
    | g(sK0)
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f88,f15]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ( g(sK0)
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f89,f34]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f90,f24]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ( g(sK0)
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_12 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f86,f34]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_12 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f93,f24]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_12 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ( ~ h(sK1)
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f33]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f97,f19]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f98]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f25]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(s19,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f35]) ).

cnf(s23,plain,
    ( spl2_4
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f40]) ).

cnf(s63,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f72]) ).

cnf(s77,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_2
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f80]) ).

cnf(s81,plain,
    ( spl2_11
    | spl2_12 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f87]) ).

cnf(s86,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_11 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f92]) ).

cnf(s89,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_12 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f95]) ).

cnf(s99,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f99]) ).

cnf(s100,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_4
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s81,s89,s86]) ).

cnf(s101,plain,
    ( spl2_4
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(rat,[],[s63,s19,s23]) ).

cnf(s102,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s63,s15,s77,s100,s101]) ).

cnf(s103,plain,
    spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s99,s102]) ).

cnf(s104,plain,
    ~ spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s11,s102]) ).

cnf(s106,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s100,s104,s103]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s106]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN920+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:13:39 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.08/0.22  Running first-order model finding
% 0.08/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401923)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=3384956820:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2401923-2401930"...
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)...printing done.
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401929)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.08/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)------------------------------
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401930)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.08/0.26  % (2401923)Success in time 0.031 s
% 0.08/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------