↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SYN921+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 09:28:38 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   5   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   4 sgn   2   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,plain,
    ? [X] :
    ! [Y] :
      ( ( p(Y)
       => q(X) )
     => ( p(X)
       => q(X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_negated,plain,
    ~ ? [X] :
      ! [Y] :
        ( ( p(Y)
         => q(X) )
       => ( p(X)
         => q(X) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(1,plain,
    p(X0),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    p(sK1(X0_2)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(0,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK1(X0))
    | q(X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK1(X0_2))
    | q(X0_2) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

cnf(2,plain,
    ~ q(X0),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l2,plain,
    ~ q(X0_2),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SYN921+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.09  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Tue Jul 22 18:49:19 EDT 2025
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.09/0.29  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.09/0.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------