↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN922+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:43:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (  23   ~;  23   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   6 sgn  20   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ( ! [X] :
        ( q(X)
        & p(X) )
  <=> ( ! [X] : q(X)
      & ! [X] : p(X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X] :
          ( q(X)
          & p(X) )
    <=> ( ! [X] : q(X)
        & ! [X] : p(X) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ( ( ? [X] : ~ q(X)
      | ? [X4] : ~ p(X4)
      | ? [X3] :
          ( ~ q(X3)
          | ~ p(X3) ) )
    & ( ( ! [X2] : q(X2)
        & ! [X1] : p(X1) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_this_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ q(sK2)
      | ~ p(sK1)
      | ~ q(sK0)
      | ~ p(sK0) )
    & ( ( ! [X2] : q(X2)
        & ! [X1] : p(X1) )
      | ! [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X3,sK0),skolemize(X4,sK1),skolemize(X,sK2)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ q(sK2)
      | ~ p(sK1)
      | ~ q(sK0)
      | ~ p(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( q(VAR_1)
        | q(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( p(VAR_1)
        | q(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( q(VAR_1)
        | p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( p(VAR_1)
        | p(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(B)
    | p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(B)
    | q(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(sK2)
    | ~ p(sK1)
    | ~ q(sK0)
    | ~ p(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,plain,
    p(A),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_2]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    q(A),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_4]) ).

cnf(c_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(sK2)
    | ~ p(sK1)
    | ~ q(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(sK2)
    | ~ p(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q(sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN922+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:52:40 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 1706992 was started by sandbox on n026,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 18:52:40 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.37  
% 0.10/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/0.38  % Length of proof is 7.
% 0.14/0.38  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.14/0.38  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.14/0.38  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------