↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SYN922+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:49:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN922+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed May  8 20:20:08 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.52  % Version:  1.5
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.52  fof(prove_this,conjecture,((![X]:(p(X)&q(X)))<=>((![X]:p(X))&(![X]:q(X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_this)).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~((![X]:(p(X)&q(X)))<=>((![X]:p(X))&(![X]:q(X))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(((?[X]:(~p(X)|~q(X)))|((?[X]:~p(X))|(?[X]:~q(X))))&((![X]:(p(X)&q(X)))|((![X]:p(X))&(![X]:q(X))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,((((?[X]:~p(X))|(?[X]:~q(X)))|((?[X]:~p(X))|(?[X]:~q(X))))&(((![X]:p(X))&(![X]:q(X)))|((![X]:p(X))&(![X]:q(X))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,((((?[X2]:~p(X2))|(?[X3]:~q(X3)))|((?[X4]:~p(X4))|(?[X5]:~q(X5))))&(((![X6]:p(X6))&(![X7]:q(X7)))|((![X8]:p(X8))&(![X9]:q(X9))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(((~p(skolem0001)|~q(skolem0002))|(~p(skolem0003)|~q(skolem0004)))&((p(X6)&q(X7))|(p(X8)&q(X9)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((~p(skolem0001)|~q(skolem0002))|(~p(skolem0003)|~q(skolem0004)))&(((![X6]:p(X6))&(![X7]:q(X7)))|((![X8]:p(X8))&(![X9]:q(X9))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).])).
% 0.19/0.52  fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(((~p(skolem0001)|~q(skolem0002))|(~p(skolem0003)|~q(skolem0004)))&(((p(X6)|p(X8))&(p(X6)|q(X9)))&((q(X7)|p(X8))&(q(X7)|q(X9))))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,p(X10)|p(X11),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c12,plain,p(X12),inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c8])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,q(X18)|q(X17),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c13,plain,q(X19),inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c11])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,~p(skolem0001)|~q(skolem0002)|~p(skolem0003)|~q(skolem0004),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c16,plain,~p(skolem0001)|~q(skolem0002)|~p(skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c13, c7])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c17,plain,~p(skolem0001)|~q(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16, c12])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c18,plain,~p(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c17, c13])).
% 0.19/0.52  cnf(c19,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c18, c12])).
% 0.19/0.52  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.52  
% 0.19/0.52  % Initial clauses    : 5
% 0.19/0.52  % Processed clauses  : 8
% 0.19/0.52  % Factors computed   : 2
% 0.19/0.52  % Resolvents computed: 6
% 0.19/0.52  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.19/0.52  % Forward subsumed   : 2
% 0.19/0.52  % Backward subsumed  : 5
% 0.19/0.52  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.19/0.52  % User time          : 0.155 s
% 0.19/0.52  % System time        : 0.023 s
% 0.19/0.52  % Total time         : 0.177 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------