%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SYN926+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:50:55 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 2 sgn 2 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
( ? [X1] :
( p(X1)
& q(X1) )
=> ( ? [X1] : p(X1)
& ? [X1] : q(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
fof(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ? [X1] :
( p(X1)
& q(X1) )
=> ( ? [X1] : p(X1)
& ? [X1] : q(X1) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).
fof(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X6,X7] :
( p(esk1_0)
& q(esk1_0)
& ( ~ p(X6)
| ~ q(X7) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1)
| ~ q(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
q(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
p(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]),
[final] ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_5,i_0_4,i_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN926+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 08:49:47 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.62 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.62 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.63 % Total time : 1.271s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------