↑ Up

JavaRes---1.3.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : JavaRes---1.3.0
% Problem  : SYN929+1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xmx15G -cp /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin atp.ProverFOF -i /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark --eqax --proof --forward-subsumption --backward_subsumption --delete-tautologies --timeout 0 %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Mar 28 18:31:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem    : SYN929+1 : TPTP v7.5.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -Xmx15G -cp /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin atp.ProverFOF -i /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark --eqax --proof --forward-subsumption --backward_subsumption --delete-tautologies --timeout 0 %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer   : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model      : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUModel   : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % RAMPerCPU  : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Thu Mar 10 17:55:41 EST 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.45  # Using default include path : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark
% 0.18/0.46  # INFO in ProverFOF.main(): Processing file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): filename: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): opts: {backward_subsumption=true, delete-tautologies=true, filename=/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p, forward-subsumption=true, proof=true, eqax=true, timeout=0}
% 0.18/0.46  # ProverFOF.processTestFile(): evals: [Heuristics: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval] litSelect: LARGEST indexing: true delTaut: true forSub: true backSub: true]
% 0.18/0.50  # hasConjecture: true isFOF: true
% 0.18/0.51  # ProofState(): heuristics: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval]
% 0.18/0.51  # HeuristicsClauseSet using eval functions: PickGiven5 : [SymbolCountEval21, FIFOEval]
% 0.18/0.51  # -----------------
% 0.18/0.51  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51  fof(prove_this,conjecture,((~(?[Y]:p(Y)))=>(![Y]:((?[X]:p(X))=>p(Y)))),input).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~((~(?[Y]:p(Y)))=>(![Y]:((?[X]:p(X))=>p(Y))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~((~(?[Y]:p(Y)))=>(![Y]:((?[X]:p(X))=>p(Y))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,((![Y]:~p(Y))&(?[Y]:((?[X]:p(X))&~p(Y)))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,((![VAR0]:~p(VAR0))&(?[VAR2]:((?[VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~p(VAR2)))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,((![VAR0]:~p(VAR0))&(p(skf4)&~p(skf3))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(~p(VAR0)&(p(skf4)&~p(skf3))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f9,negated_conjecture,(~p(VAR0)&(p(skf4)&~p(skf3))),inference(distribute, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.18/0.51  cnf(cnf0,negated_conjecture,~p(X1),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f9])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(prove_this,conjecture,((~(?[Y]:p(Y)))=>(![Y]:((?[X]:p(X))=>p(Y)))),input).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f1,negated_conjecture,(~((~(?[Y]:p(Y)))=>(![Y]:((?[X]:p(X))=>p(Y))))),inference(assume_negation, status(cth), [prove_this])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f4,negated_conjecture,(~((~(?[Y]:p(Y)))=>(![Y]:((?[X]:p(X))=>p(Y))))),inference(fof_simplification, status(thm), [f1])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f5,negated_conjecture,((![Y]:~p(Y))&(?[Y]:((?[X]:p(X))&~p(Y)))),inference(fof_nnf, status(thm), [f4])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f6,negated_conjecture,((![VAR0]:~p(VAR0))&(?[VAR2]:((?[VAR1]:p(VAR1))&~p(VAR2)))),inference(variable_rename, status(thm), [f5])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f7,negated_conjecture,((![VAR0]:~p(VAR0))&(p(skf4)&~p(skf3))),inference(skolemize, status(esa), [f6])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f8,negated_conjecture,(~p(VAR0)&(p(skf4)&~p(skf3))),inference(shift_quantors, status(thm), [f7])).
% 0.18/0.51  fof(f9,negated_conjecture,(~p(VAR0)&(p(skf4)&~p(skf3))),inference(distribute, status(thm), [f8])).
% 0.18/0.51  cnf(cnf1,negated_conjecture,p(skf4),inference(split_conjunct, status(thm), [f9])).
% 0.18/0.51  cnf(c0,plain,$false,inference(resolution, status(thm), [cnf1, cnf0])).
% 0.18/0.51  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.52  # Filename           : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.52  # Indexed            : true
% 0.18/0.52  # Eval function name : PickGiven5
% 0.18/0.52  # Initial clauses    : 3
% 0.18/0.52  # Processed clauses  : 2
% 0.18/0.52  # Factors computed   : 0
% 0.18/0.52  # Resolvents computed: 1
% 0.18/0.52  # Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.18/0.52  # Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.18/0.52  # Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.18/0.52  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.52  # SZS Expected       : Theorem
% 0.18/0.52  # time               : 6ms
% 0.18/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------