%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SYN930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:14:54 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.33s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SYN930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0. % 0.00/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 03:42:04 EDT 2022 % 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime : % 0.16/0.33 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.16/0.33 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.16/0.33 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.16/0.33 # % 0.16/0.33 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.16/0.33 # Number of axioms: 5 Number of unprocessed: 3 % 0.16/0.33 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.16/0.33 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.16/0.33 # Hello from C++ % 0.16/0.33 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.16/0.33 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.16/0.33 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.16/0.33 # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.16/0.33 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures. % 0.16/0.33 # There are 3 start rule candidates: % 0.16/0.33 # Found 1 unit axioms. % 0.16/0.33 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.16/0.33 # 3 start rule tableaux created. % 0.16/0.33 # 2 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.16/0.33 # 1 unit axiom clauses % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.16/0.33 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3 % 0.16/0.33 # Returning from population with 9 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.16/0.33 # We now have 9 tableaux to operate on % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 2 folds and 2 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(esk1_0)|p(esk1_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_14])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 1 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 2 folds and 2 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(esk2_0)|p(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (~p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (~p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 2 folds and 2 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.33 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.33 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, (~c)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~p(esk1_0)|~p(esk2_0))). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(X1)|p(X2))). % 0.16/0.33 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.33 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # Found 5 steps % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, (p(esk1_0)|p(esk1_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~p(esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (p(esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_18])). % 0.16/0.33 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (p(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.16/0.33 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.33 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.33 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.33 # Child (6376) has found a proof. % 0.16/0.33 % 0.16/0.33 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 2 folds and 2 closures done. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.33 # Proof search is over... % 0.16/0.33 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------