↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN931+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:16 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 5.32s 5.51s
% Output   : Proof 5.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SYN931+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:36:53 EDT 2025
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 5.32/5.51  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/5.51  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Iff (Exists fun X => And (p X) c) (And (Exists fun X => p X) c))) True
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #1 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (Not (Iff (Exists fun X => And (p X) c) (And (Exists p) c))) True
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (Iff (Exists fun X => And (p X) c) (And (Exists p) c)) False
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq (Exists fun X => And (p X) c) False) (Eq (And (Exists p) c) False)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): Or (Eq (Exists fun X => And (p X) c) True) (Eq (And (Exists p) c) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (Exists p) c) False) (Eq (And (p a) c) False)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (p a) c) False) (Or (Eq (Exists p) False) (Eq c False))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p) False) (Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq c False)))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Or (Eq c False) (Eq (p a_1) False)))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #9 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq c False) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #10 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (Exists p) c) True) (Eq (And (p (skS.0 0 a)) c) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (p (skS.0 0 a)) c) True) (Eq c True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (p (skS.0 0 a)) c) True) (Eq (Exists p) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): Or (Eq c True) (Eq c True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #15 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[13]): Eq c True
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #16 (by backward demodulation #[15, 9]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (p a_1) False)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #20 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (Exists p) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #23 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a_1)) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #24 (by superposition #[23, 17]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (p a_1) False))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #29 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True) (Eq (p a_1) False)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #30 (by superposition #[29, 23]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True) (Or (Eq False True) (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a_1)) True))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #33 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a_1)) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #36 (by equality factoring #[33]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Ne True True) (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq True False))
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #39 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True) (Eq True False)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p (skS.0 2 a)) True
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #41 (by superposition #[40, 17]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (p a) False)
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #43 (by clausification #[41]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p a) False
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #44 (by superposition #[43, 40]): Eq False True
% 5.32/5.51  Clause #45 (by clausification #[44]): False
% 5.32/5.51  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------