↑ Up

Z3---4.15.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.15.1
% Problem  : SYN931+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Jun 21 05:41:01 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.38s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN931+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 20 13:01:42 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.38  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.38  tff(p_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.38     p: $i > $o)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(c_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.38     c: $o)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(tptp_fun_X_0_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.38     tptp_fun_X_0: $i)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(tptp_fun_X_1_type, type, (
% 0.13/0.38     tptp_fun_X_1: $i)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(1,assumption,(![X: $i] : ((~p(X)) | (~c))), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(2,assumption,(p(X!1)), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(3,assumption,(![X: $i] : (~p(X))), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(4,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((~![X: $i] : (~p(X))) | (~p(X!1))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(5,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ($false),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[4, 2, 3])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(6,plain,((~![X: $i] : (~p(X))) | (~p(X!1))), inference(lemma,lemma(discharge,[]))).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(7,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (~![X: $i] : (~p(X))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[6, 2])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(8,assumption,(~c), introduced(assumption)).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(9,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (((~c) | (~p(X!0))) | c),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(10,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((~c) | (~p(X!0))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[9, 8])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(11,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (((~c) | (~p(X!1))) | c),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(tautology,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(12,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((~c) | (~p(X!1))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[11, 8])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(13,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (((p(X!0) & c) | (p(X!1) & c)) <=> ((~((~c) | (~p(X!0)))) | (~((~c) | (~p(X!1)))))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(14,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((((p(X!0) & c) | (p(X!1) & c)) & (![X: $i] : (~(p(X) & c)) | (![X: $i] : (~p(X)) | (~c)))) <=> (((p(X!0) & c) | (p(X!1) & c)) & (![X: $i] : (~(p(X) & c)) | ![X: $i] : (~p(X)) | (~c)))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(15,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))) <=> (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c)))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(16,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c)) <=> (?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(17,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))) <=> (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c)))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[16])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(18,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      ((~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))) <=> (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c)))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[17, 15])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(19,axiom,(~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','prove_this')).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(20,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 18])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(21,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 18])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(22,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[21, 15])).
% 0.13/0.38  tff(23,plain,
% 0.13/0.38      (~(?[X: $i] : (p(X) & c) <=> (?[X: $i] : p(X) & c))),
% 0.13/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[22, 18])).
% 0.13/0.38  unexpected number of arguments: (let ((a!1 (exists ((X $i)) (and (p X) c)))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!3 (forall ((X $i)) (not (and (p X) c))))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!5 (exists ((X $i)) (p X)))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!7 (lambda ((X $i)) (refl (~ (not (p X)) (not (p X))))))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!8 (forall ((X $i)) (not (p X)))))
% 0.13/0.38  (let ((a!2 (sk (~ a!1 (and (p X!0) c))))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!4 (nnf-neg (proof-bind (lambda ((X $i))
% 0.13/0.38                                    (let ((a!1 (~ (not (and (p X) c))
% 0.13/0.38                                                  (not (and (p X) c)))))
% 0.13/0.38                                      (refl a!1))))
% 0.13/0.38                      (~ (not a!1) a!3)))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!6 (monotonicity (sk (~ a!5 (p X!1)))
% 0.13/0.38                           (refl (~ c c))
% 0.13/0.38                           (~ (and a!5 c) (and (p X!1) c))))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!9 (nnf-neg (nnf-neg (proof-bind a!7) (~ (not a!5) a!8))
% 0.13/0.38                      (refl (~ (not c) (not c)))
% 0.13/0.38                      (~ (not (and a!5 c)) (or a!8 (not c)))))
% 0.13/0.38        (a!10 (and (or (and (p X!0) c) (and (p X!1) c)) (or a!3 (or a!8 (not c))))))
% 0.13/0.38  (let ((a!11 (~ (not (= a!1 (and a!5 c))) a!10)))
% 0.13/0.38    (nnf-neg a!2 a!4 a!6 a!9 a!11))))
% 0.13/0.38  Proof display could not be completed: unexpected number of arguments
% 0.13/0.38  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------