↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SYN939+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:11:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  131 (  54   ~;  45   |;  26   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   6 sgn  30   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [C,B] :
      ( ! [Z] : q(f(Z))
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( q(X)
          & ( r(Y)
           => ( r(C)
              & r(B) ) )
          & ( p(f(Y))
           => p(X) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f_1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [C,B] :
        ( ! [Z] : q(f(Z))
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( q(X)
            & ( r(Y)
             => ( r(C)
                & r(B) ) )
            & ( p(f(Y))
             => p(X) ) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(f_1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [C,B] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ~ q(X)
          | ( ( ~ r(C)
              | ~ r(B) )
            & r(Y) )
          | ( ~ p(X)
            & p(f(Y)) ) )
      & ! [Z] : q(f(Z)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_4,U_3] :
      ( ! [U_2,U_1] :
          ( ~ q(U_2)
          | ( ( ~ r(U_4)
              | ~ r(U_3) )
            & r(U_1) )
          | ( ~ p(U_2)
            & p(f(U_1)) ) )
      & ! [U_0] : q(f(U_0)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_4,U_3] :
      ! [U_2] :
        ( ! [U_1] :
            ( ( ( ~ r(U_4)
                | ~ r(U_3) )
              & r(U_1) )
            | ( ~ p(U_2)
              & p(f(U_1)) ) )
        | ~ q(U_2) )
    & ! [U_0] : q(f(U_0)) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_1_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_3] :
      ! [U_2] :
        ( ! [U_1] :
            ( ( ( ~ r(sK1)
                | ~ r(U_3) )
              & r(U_1) )
            | ( ~ p(U_2)
              & p(f(U_1)) ) )
        | ~ q(U_2) )
    & ! [U_0] : q(f(U_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_4,sK1)],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_1_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_2] :
        ( ! [U_1] :
            ( ( ( ~ r(sK1)
                | ~ r(sK2) )
              & r(U_1) )
            | ( ~ p(U_2)
              & p(f(U_1)) ) )
        | ~ q(U_2) )
    & ! [U_0] : q(f(U_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_3,sK2)],[f_1_5]) ).

fof(f_1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_1] :
        ( ~ r(sK1)
        | ~ r(sK2)
        | ~ sP1(U_1) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( r(U_1)
        | ~ sP1(U_1) )
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( ~ p(U_2)
        | ~ sP0(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( p(f(U_1))
        | ~ sP0(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( sP1(U_1)
        | sP0(U_2,U_1)
        | ~ q(U_2) )
    & ! [U_0] : q(f(U_0)) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa),new_symbols(definitional,[sP0,sP1])],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(f_1_8,negated_conjecture,
    q(f(U_0)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP1(U_1)
    | sP0(U_2,U_1)
    | ~ q(U_2) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(U_1))
    | ~ sP0(U_2,U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(U_2)
    | ~ sP0(U_2,U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(U_1)
    | ~ sP1(U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r(sK1)
    | ~ r(sK2)
    | ~ sP1(U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ( ~ r(sK2)
    | ~ r(sK1)
    | ~ sP1(U_55) ),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_1_13]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( sP0(f(U_55),U_55)
    | ~ q(f(U_55))
    | sP1(U_55) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_1_9]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    q(f(U_55)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( ~ p(f(U_55))
    | ~ sP0(f(U_55),U_55) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_1_11]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    ( ~ sP0(f(U_55),U_55)
    | p(f(U_55)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_1_10]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[t8:2,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    ( ~ sP1(sK1)
    | r(sK1) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:2)],[f_1_12]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t11:1)],[t11:1,t1:2]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    ( sP0(f(sK1),sK1)
    | ~ q(f(sK1))
    | sP1(sK1) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t11:2)],[f_1_9]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t13:1)],[t13:1,t11:2]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    q(f(sK1)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t13:2)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t15:1)],[t15:1,t13:2]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    ( ~ p(f(sK1))
    | ~ sP0(f(sK1),sK1) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t13:3)],[f_1_11]) ).

cnf(t18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t17:1)],[t17:1,t13:3]) ).

cnf(t19,plain,
    ( ~ sP0(f(sK1),sK1)
    | p(f(sK1)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t17:2)],[f_1_10]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t19:1)],[t19:1,t17:2]) ).

cnf(t21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t19:2)],[t19:2,t13:3]) ).

cnf(t22,plain,
    ( ~ sP1(sK2)
    | r(sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:3)],[f_1_12]) ).

cnf(t23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t22:1)],[t22:1,t1:3]) ).

cnf(t24,plain,
    ( sP0(f(sK2),sK2)
    | ~ q(f(sK2))
    | sP1(sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t22:2)],[f_1_9]) ).

cnf(t25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t24:1)],[t24:1,t22:2]) ).

cnf(t26,plain,
    q(f(sK2)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t24:2)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t26:1)],[t26:1,t24:2]) ).

cnf(t28,plain,
    ( ~ p(f(sK2))
    | ~ sP0(f(sK2),sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t24:3)],[f_1_11]) ).

cnf(t29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t28:1)],[t28:1,t24:3]) ).

cnf(t30,plain,
    ( ~ sP0(f(sK2),sK2)
    | p(f(sK2)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t28:2)],[f_1_10]) ).

cnf(t31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t30:1)],[t30:1,t28:2]) ).

cnf(t32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(reduction,[status(thm),parent(t30:2)],[t30:2,t24:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN939+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 07:30:44 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------