↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SYN939+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:34:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.48s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  21   ~;  20   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (  15 sgn   6   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] : q(f(X2))
     => ? [X3,X4] :
          ( q(X3)
          & ( r(X4)
           => ( r(X0)
              & r(X1) ) )
          & ( p(f(X4))
           => p(X3) ) ) ) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ! [X2] : q(f(X2))
       => ? [X3,X4] :
            ( q(X3)
            & ( r(X4)
             => ( r(X0)
                & r(X1) ) )
            & ( p(f(X4))
             => p(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c0,plain,
    q(f(X0)),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c1,plain,
    ( ~ q(X1)
    | r(X0)
    | p(f(X0)) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    ( ~ q(X1)
    | ~ r(sK0)
    | ~ r(sK1)
    | p(f(X0)) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( ~ q(X0)
    | r(X1)
    | ~ p(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c4,plain,
    ( ~ q(X0)
    | ~ r(sK0)
    | ~ r(sK1)
    | ~ p(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( p(f(X0))
    | r(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1,c0]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    ( r(X0)
    | r(X1)
    | ~ q(f(X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3,d0]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    ( r(X1)
    | r(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c0,d1]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    r(X0),
    inference(factoring,[status(thm)],[d2]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    ( ~ p(X0)
    | ~ r(sK0)
    | ~ q(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,c4]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    ( ~ p(X0)
    | ~ q(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,d4]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    ( p(f(X1))
    | ~ r(sK0)
    | ~ q(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,c2]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    ( p(f(X1))
    | ~ q(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,d6]) ).

cnf(d8,plain,
    p(f(X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d7,c0]) ).

cnf(d9,plain,
    ~ q(f(X0)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d8,d5]) ).

cnf(d10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c0,d9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN939+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:49:09 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.48/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 8.48/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------