↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : SYN941+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:36:22 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.97s 0.99s
% Output   : Proof 3.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  18   ~;  12   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   8 sgn   8   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f0,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( q(f(B))
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( q(X)
          & ( p(f(Y))
           => ( ( r(Y)
               => ( r(C)
                  & r(B) ) )
              & p(X) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f0_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( q(f(B))
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( q(X)
            & ( p(f(Y))
             => ( ( r(Y)
                 => ( r(C)
                    & r(B) ) )
                & p(X) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f0]) ).

fof(f0_nnf,plain,
    ? [B,C] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ~ q(X)
          | ( ( ( ( ~ r(C)
                  | ~ r(B) )
                & r(Y) )
              | ~ p(X) )
            & p(f(Y)) ) )
      & q(f(B)) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f0_neg]) ).

fof(f0_sk,plain,
    ! [Y,X] :
      ( ( ~ q(X)
        | ( ( ( ( ~ r(sk1)
                | ~ r(sk0) )
              & r(Y) )
            | ~ p(X) )
          & p(f(Y)) ) )
      & q(f(sk0)) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0,sk1])],[f0_nnf]) ).

cnf(c1,plain,
    ( ~ q(X2)
    | p(f(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi1,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(q(X0),true,p(f(X1)),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c1]) ).

cnf(c0,plain,
    q(f(sk0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi0,negated_conjecture,
    q(f(sk0)) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c0]) ).

cnf(h0,plain,
    p(f(V0)) = true,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi1,hi0]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    ( ~ q(X2)
    | r(X3)
    | ~ p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi2,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(p(X0),true,ifeq(q(X0),true,r(X1),true),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).

cnf(h1,plain,
    r(V0) = true,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi2,h0,hi0]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( ~ q(X2)
    | ~ r(sk1)
    | ~ r(sk0)
    | ~ p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi3,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(p(X0),true,ifeq(r(sk0),true,ifeq(r(sk1),true,ifeq(q(X0),true,false,true),true),true),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c3]) ).

cnf(t0,plain,
    true = false,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi3,h0,h1,h1,hi0]) ).

cnf(t20,plain,
    false = true,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t0]) ).

cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
    true != false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c3]) ).

cnf(g0_0,plain,
    true != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0,t20]) ).

cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN941+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:31:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.97/0.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/0.99  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------