↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN941+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:43:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 5.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  30   ~;  22   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   6 sgn  13   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [B,C] :
      ( q(f(B))
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( q(X)
          & ( p(f(Y))
           => ( ( r(Y)
               => ( r(C)
                  & r(B) ) )
              & p(X) ) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B,C] :
        ( q(f(B))
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( q(X)
            & ( p(f(Y))
             => ( ( r(Y)
                 => ( r(C)
                    & r(B) ) )
                & p(X) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ? [B,C] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ~ q(X)
          | ( ( ( ( ~ r(C)
                  | ~ r(B) )
                & r(Y) )
              | ~ p(X) )
            & p(f(Y)) ) )
      & q(f(B)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_this_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] :
        ( ~ q(X)
        | ( ( ( ( ~ r(sK1)
                | ~ r(sK0) )
              & r(Y) )
            | ~ p(X) )
          & p(f(Y)) ) )
    & q(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( ~ q(VAR_0)
        | ~ r(sK1)
        | ~ r(sK0)
        | ~ p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ q(VAR_0)
        | r(VAR_1)
        | ~ p(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ q(VAR_1)
        | p(f(VAR_0)) )
    & q(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(B)
    | p(f(A)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    q(f(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(A)
    | r(B)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(A)
    | ~ r(sK1)
    | ~ r(sK0)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    p(f(A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( r(A)
    | ~ p(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r(sK1)
    | ~ r(sK0)
    | ~ p(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r(sK1)
    | ~ r(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    r(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_12]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SYN941+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.41  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/5.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/5.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/5.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:50:46 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/5.41  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.14/5.41  % Process 1894247 was started by sandbox2 on n006,
% 0.14/5.41  % Sat Sep 26 18:50:46 2026
% 0.14/5.41  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/5.42  
% 0.14/5.42  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/5.43  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.14/5.43  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/5.43  % Maximum clause weight is 4.000.
% 0.14/5.43  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------