↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYN941+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:22:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   2 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  22   ~;  18   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  18   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( q(f(X0))
     => ? [X2,X3] :
          ( ( p(f(X3))
           => ( p(X2)
              & ( r(X3)
               => ( r(X0)
                  & r(X1) ) ) ) )
          & q(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( q(f(X0))
       => ? [X2,X3] :
            ( ( p(f(X3))
             => ( p(X2)
                & ( r(X3)
                 => ( r(X0)
                    & r(X1) ) ) ) )
            & q(X2) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( ( ~ p(X2)
              | ( ( ~ r(X0)
                  | ~ r(X1) )
                & r(X3) ) )
            & p(f(X3)) )
          | ~ q(X2) )
      & q(f(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X3] :
        ( ( ( ~ p(X2)
            | ( ( ~ r(sK0)
                | ~ r(sK1) )
              & r(X3) ) )
          & p(f(X3)) )
        | ~ q(X2) )
    & q(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    q(f(sK0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( p(f(X3))
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ p(X2)
      | r(X3)
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ p(X2)
      | ~ r(sK0)
      | ~ r(sK1)
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( p(X2)
      | ~ r(sK0)
      | ~ r(sK1)
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( p(X2)
      | r(X3)
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ p(f(X3))
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(finite_model_not_found_(exhaustively_excluded_all_possible_domain_size_assignments),[],[f9,f10,f11,f5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN941+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:15:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.23  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120902)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=2430405135_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.27  % TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-4120902-4120907"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120907)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.27  % (4120902)Success in time 0.031 s
% 0.20/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------