↑ Up

Drodi---4.1.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---4.1.1
% Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:18:32 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   5 unt;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  120 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  135 (  44   ~;  50   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (  23   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
    ? [X,X2,X3,X4,Y] :
      ( ( ( s(A,Y)
         => p(Y) )
        & ( e(X2)
         => ( c(f(X2))
            | g(X2) ) )
        & ( e(X)
         => ( s(X,f(X))
            | g(X) ) )
        & e(A)
        & p(A) )
     => ( ( c(X4)
          & p(X4) )
        | ( g(X3)
          & p(X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
      ? [X,X2,X3,X4,Y] :
        ( ( ( s(A,Y)
           => p(Y) )
          & ( e(X2)
           => ( c(f(X2))
              | g(X2) ) )
          & ( e(X)
           => ( s(X,f(X))
              | g(X) ) )
          & e(A)
          & p(A) )
       => ( ( c(X4)
            & p(X4) )
          | ( g(X3)
            & p(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [A] :
    ! [X,X2,X3,X4,Y] :
      ( ( ~ c(X4)
        | ~ p(X4) )
      & ( ~ g(X3)
        | ~ p(X3) )
      & ( p(Y)
        | ~ s(A,Y) )
      & ( c(f(X2))
        | g(X2)
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( s(X,f(X))
        | g(X)
        | ~ e(X) )
      & e(A)
      & p(A) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( ~ c(X4)
        | ~ p(X4) )
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ~ g(X3)
        | ~ p(X3) )
    & ? [A] :
        ( ! [Y] :
            ( p(Y)
            | ~ s(A,Y) )
        & ! [X2] :
            ( c(f(X2))
            | g(X2)
            | ~ e(X2) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( s(X,f(X))
            | g(X)
            | ~ e(X) )
        & e(A)
        & p(A) ) ),
    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ! [X4] :
        ( ~ c(X4)
        | ~ p(X4) )
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ~ g(X3)
        | ~ p(X3) )
    & ! [Y] :
        ( p(Y)
        | ~ s(sK0_skl,Y) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( c(f(X2))
        | g(X2)
        | ~ e(X2) )
    & ! [X] :
        ( s(X,f(X))
        | g(X)
        | ~ e(X) )
    & e(sK0_skl)
    & p(sK0_skl) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0_skl]),skolemize(A,sK0_skl)],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    p(sK0_skl),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    e(sK0_skl),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( s(X0,f(X0))
      | g(X0)
      | ~ e(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c(f(X0))
      | g(X0)
      | ~ e(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( p(X0)
      | ~ s(sK0_skl,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ g(X0)
      | ~ p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c(X0)
      | ~ p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( g(sK0_skl)
    | ~ e(sK0_skl)
    | p(f(sK0_skl)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f10,f8]) ).

fof(f14,definition,
    ( sQ0_spl
  <=> p(f(sK0_skl)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ0_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ~ sQ0_spl
    | p(f(sK0_skl)) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

fof(f17,definition,
    ( sQ1_spl
  <=> e(sK0_skl) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ1_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | ~ e(sK0_skl) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

fof(f20,definition,
    ( sQ2_spl
  <=> g(sK0_skl) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sQ2_spl])],[split_symbol_definition]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ~ sQ2_spl
    | g(sK0_skl) ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( sQ2_spl
    | ~ sQ1_spl
    | sQ0_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f14,f17,f20]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( ~ sQ2_spl
    | ~ p(sK0_skl) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f21,f11]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ~ sQ2_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24,f6]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ~ sQ2_spl,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p(f(X0))
      | g(X0)
      | ~ e(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f9,f12]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ~ sQ0_spl
    | g(sK0_skl)
    | ~ e(sK0_skl) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f27,f15]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( ~ sQ0_spl
    | sQ2_spl
    | ~ sQ1_spl ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f28,f17,f20,f14]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( sQ1_spl
    | $false ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f19,f7]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    sQ1_spl,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f30]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f23,f26,f29,f31]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : drodi -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:32:16 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.12/0.38  % Refutation found
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.41  % Elapsed time: 0.043691 seconds
% 0.12/0.41  % CPU time: 0.110656 seconds
% 0.12/0.41  % Total memory used: 16.595 MB
% 0.12/0.41  % Net memory used: 16.046 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------