↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:06:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.50s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   7 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  127 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  140 (  47   ~;  53   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  23   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( p(X0)
        & e(X0)
        & ( e(X1)
         => ( g(X1)
            | s(X1,f(X1)) ) )
        & ( e(X2)
         => ( g(X2)
            | c(f(X2)) ) )
        & ( s(X0,X5)
         => p(X5) ) )
     => ( ( p(X3)
          & g(X3) )
        | ( p(X4)
          & c(X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
      ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
        ( ( p(X0)
          & e(X0)
          & ( e(X1)
           => ( g(X1)
              | s(X1,f(X1)) ) )
          & ( e(X2)
           => ( g(X2)
              | c(f(X2)) ) )
          & ( s(X0,X5)
           => p(X5) ) )
       => ( ( p(X3)
            & g(X3) )
          | ( p(X4)
            & c(X4) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ p(X3)
        | ~ g(X3) )
      & ( ~ p(X4)
        | ~ c(X4) )
      & p(X0)
      & e(X0)
      & ( g(X1)
        | s(X1,f(X1))
        | ~ e(X1) )
      & ( g(X2)
        | c(f(X2))
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ s(X0,X5) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ p(X3)
        | ~ g(X3) )
      & ( ~ p(X4)
        | ~ c(X4) )
      & p(X0)
      & e(X0)
      & ( g(X1)
        | s(X1,f(X1))
        | ~ e(X1) )
      & ( g(X2)
        | c(f(X2))
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ s(X0,X5) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ p(X3)
        | ~ g(X3) )
      & ( ~ p(X4)
        | ~ c(X4) )
      & p(sK0)
      & e(sK0)
      & ( g(X1)
        | s(X1,f(X1))
        | ~ e(X1) )
      & ( g(X2)
        | c(f(X2))
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ s(sK0,X5) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( ~ s(sK0,X5)
      | p(X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( c(f(X2))
      | g(X2)
      | ~ e(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( s(X1,f(X1))
      | g(X1)
      | ~ e(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    e(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    p(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ c(X4)
      | ~ p(X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ g(X3)
      | ~ p(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p(f(X0))
      | ~ e(X0)
      | g(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f11]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( g(sK0)
    | ~ e(sK0)
    | p(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f8,f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( g(sK0)
    | p(f(sK0)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f14,f9]) ).

fof(f17,definition,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> p(f(sK0)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( p(f(sK0))
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f21,definition,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> g(sK0) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl1_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( ~ g(sK0)
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( g(sK0)
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f15,f21,f17]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK0)
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f23,f12]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f25,f10]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ~ e(sK0)
    | g(sK0)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f19,f13]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( g(sK0)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f28,f9]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f29,f22]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f24]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f27]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ~ spl1_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s2]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s2,s4]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s5]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.17  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:17:25 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.20  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.20  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550667)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550674)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=1267919796:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=257893983:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550678)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=3943154046:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550672)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1972028238:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550673)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=103697291:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550676)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=647000793:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550675)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=1279935209:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550678)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)First to succeed.
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550676)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3550667"
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550675)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 3.50/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.50/1.25  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)------------------------------
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Termination reason: Refutation
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Peak memory usage: 89 MB
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)------------------------------
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550677)------------------------------
% 3.50/1.25  % (3550667)Success in time 0.413 s
% 3.50/1.25  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------