↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:22:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  31   ~;  37   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (  24   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( p(X0)
        & e(X0)
        & ( e(X1)
         => ( g(X1)
            | s(X1,f(X1)) ) )
        & ( e(X2)
         => ( g(X2)
            | c(f(X2)) ) )
        & ( s(X0,X5)
         => p(X5) ) )
     => ( ( p(X3)
          & g(X3) )
        | ( p(X4)
          & c(X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
      ? [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
        ( ( p(X0)
          & e(X0)
          & ( e(X1)
           => ( g(X1)
              | s(X1,f(X1)) ) )
          & ( e(X2)
           => ( g(X2)
              | c(f(X2)) ) )
          & ( s(X0,X5)
           => p(X5) ) )
       => ( ( p(X3)
            & g(X3) )
          | ( p(X4)
            & c(X4) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ p(X3)
        | ~ g(X3) )
      & ( ~ p(X4)
        | ~ c(X4) )
      & p(X0)
      & e(X0)
      & ( g(X1)
        | s(X1,f(X1))
        | ~ e(X1) )
      & ( g(X2)
        | c(f(X2))
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ s(X0,X5) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ p(X3)
        | ~ g(X3) )
      & ( ~ p(X4)
        | ~ c(X4) )
      & p(X0)
      & e(X0)
      & ( g(X1)
        | s(X1,f(X1))
        | ~ e(X1) )
      & ( g(X2)
        | c(f(X2))
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ s(X0,X5) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ p(X3)
        | ~ g(X3) )
      & ( ~ p(X4)
        | ~ c(X4) )
      & p(sK0)
      & e(sK0)
      & ( g(X1)
        | s(X1,f(X1))
        | ~ e(X1) )
      & ( g(X2)
        | c(f(X2))
        | ~ e(X2) )
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ s(sK0,X5) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( p(X5)
      | ~ s(sK0,X5) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( g(X2)
      | c(f(X2))
      | ~ e(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( g(X1)
      | s(X1,f(X1))
      | ~ e(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    e(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    p(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p(X0)
      | ~ c(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p(X0)
      | ~ g(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( g(X1)
      | ~ s(X1,f(X1))
      | ~ e(X1) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( p(X5)
      | s(sK0,X5) ),
    inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(finite_model_not_found_(exhaustively_excluded_all_possible_domain_size_assignments),[],[f12,f11,f10,f9,f13,f7,f14]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.20  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.20  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:15:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.20  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.23  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.27  % (525925)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=57253068_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.27  % TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-525925-525930"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.20/0.27  % (525930)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.27  % (525925)Success in time 0.028 s
% 0.20/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------