↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 09:28:40 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named 1)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,plain,
    ! [A] :
    ? [X,X2,X3,X4,Y] :
      ( ( p(A)
        & e(A)
        & ( e(X)
         => ( g(X)
            | s(X,f(X)) ) )
        & ( e(X2)
         => ( g(X2)
            | c(f(X2)) ) )
        & ( s(A,Y)
         => p(Y) ) )
     => ( ( p(X3)
          & g(X3) )
        | ( p(X4)
          & c(X4) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [A] :
      ? [X,X2,X3,X4,Y] :
        ( ( p(A)
          & e(A)
          & ( e(X)
           => ( g(X)
              | s(X,f(X)) ) )
          & ( e(X2)
           => ( g(X2)
              | c(f(X2)) ) )
          & ( s(A,Y)
           => p(Y) ) )
       => ( ( p(X3)
            & g(X3) )
          | ( p(X4)
            & c(X4) ) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(0,plain,
    p(sK1),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    p(sK1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ( ~ p(X0)
    | ~ g(X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK1)
    | ~ g(sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    ( ~ e(X0)
    | c(f(X0))
    | g(X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l3,plain,
    ( ~ e(sK1)
    | c(f(sK1))
    | g(sK1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

% launching worker at depth: 10cnf(1, plain, e(sK1), inference(cnf, [status(esa)], [prove_this_negated])).

cnf(l4,plain,
    e(sK1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    ( ~ c(X0)
    | ~ p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l5,plain,
    ( ~ c(f(sK1))
    | ~ p(f(sK1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    ( ~ s(sK1,X0)
    | p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l6,plain,
    ( ~ s(sK1,f(sK1))
    | p(f(sK1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

cnf(2,plain,
    ( ~ e(X0)
    | g(X0)
    | s(X0,f(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l7,plain,
    ( ~ e(sK1)
    | g(sK1)
    | s(sK1,f(sK1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(l8,plain,
    e(sK1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l3,l4,l5,l6,l7,l8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN943+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 22 18:50:49 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.34  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------