↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN944+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:43:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  14   ~;   9   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   2 sgn  22   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ! [X,Y] :
            ( r(X,Y)
           => q(X,Y) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( s(X)
           => p(X) )
        & r(B,C)
        & s(B)
        & s(A) )
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( q(X,Y)
          & p(X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( ! [X,Y] :
              ( r(X,Y)
             => q(X,Y) )
          & ! [X] :
              ( s(X)
             => p(X) )
          & r(B,C)
          & s(B)
          & s(A) )
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( q(X,Y)
            & p(X) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ~ q(X,Y)
          | ~ p(X) )
      & ! [X1,X2] :
          ( q(X1,X2)
          | ~ r(X1,X2) )
      & ! [X0] :
          ( p(X0)
          | ~ s(X0) )
      & r(B,C)
      & s(B)
      & s(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_this_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] :
        ( ~ q(X,Y)
        | ~ p(X) )
    & ! [X1,X2] :
        ( q(X1,X2)
        | ~ r(X1,X2) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( p(X0)
        | ~ s(X0) )
    & r(sK0,sK1)
    & s(sK0)
    & s(sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK2),skolemize(B,sK0),skolemize(C,sK1)],[nnf_1]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(A)
    | ~ s(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    s(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    r(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(A,B)
    | ~ r(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    p(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(A,B)
    | ~ p(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    q(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_6]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q(sK0,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN944+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:51:54 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.42  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.42  % Process 134477 was started by sandbox2 on n008,
% 0.15/0.42  % Sat Sep 26 18:51:54 2026
% 0.15/0.42  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.15/0.43  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.15/0.43  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.15/0.43  % Maximum clause weight is 0.000.
% 0.15/0.43  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------