↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:07:25 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 23:03:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.47/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.47/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.47/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.47/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.47/0.60  
% 0.47/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.47/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.47/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.61  % File     : SYN949+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.47/0.61  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.47/0.61  % Problem  : Syntactic from Shults
% 0.47/0.61  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.47/0.61  % English  :
% 0.47/0.61  
% 0.47/0.61  % Refs     : [Shu04] Shults (2004), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.47/0.61  % Source   : [Shu04]
% 0.47/0.61  % Names    :
% 0.47/0.61  
% 0.47/0.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.47/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0
% 0.47/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    1 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Number of atoms       :    9 (   0 equ)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   9 avg)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Number of connectives :    8 (   0   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.47/0.61  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Maximal formula depth :   12 (  12 avg)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.47/0.61  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   6   !;   2   ?)
% 0.47/0.61  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.47/0.61  
% 0.47/0.61  % Comments :
% 0.47/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.61  fof(prove_this,conjecture,
% 0.47/0.61      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.47/0.61        ( ( s(A)
% 0.47/0.61          & s(B)
% 0.47/0.61          & r(B,C)
% 0.47/0.61          & ! [X] :
% 0.47/0.61              ( s(X)
% 0.47/0.61             => p(X) )
% 0.47/0.61          & ! [X,Y] :
% 0.47/0.61              ( r(X,Y)
% 0.47/0.61             => q(X,Y) ) )
% 0.47/0.61       => ? [X,Y] :
% 0.47/0.61            ( p(X)
% 0.47/0.61            & q(X,Y) ) ) ).
% 0.47/0.61  
% 0.47/0.61  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.47/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.47/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.47/0.61  %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.47/0.61  %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.47/0.61  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.47/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.47/0.61  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.47/0.61  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6
% 0.47/0.61  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.47/0.61  [1]P1(a1)
% 0.47/0.61  [2]P1(a2)
% 0.47/0.61  [3]P2(a2,a3)
% 0.47/0.61  [4]~P1(x41)+P3(x41)
% 0.47/0.61  [5]~P3(x51)+~P4(x51,x52)
% 0.47/0.61  [6]~P2(x61,x62)+P4(x61,x62)
% 0.47/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.47/0.61  
% 0.47/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.61  cnf(7,plain,
% 0.47/0.61     (~P4(a2,x71)),
% 0.47/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,5])).
% 0.47/0.61  cnf(8,plain,
% 0.47/0.61     ($false),
% 0.47/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,3,6]),
% 0.47/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.47/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.47/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------