↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:11:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  101 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  37   ~;  27   |;  45   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   1 sgn  47   !;  16   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ! [X,Y] :
            ( r(X,Y)
           => q(X,Y) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( s(X)
           => p(X) )
        & r(B,C)
        & s(B)
        & s(A) )
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( q(X,Y)
          & p(X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f_1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( ! [X,Y] :
              ( r(X,Y)
             => q(X,Y) )
          & ! [X] :
              ( s(X)
             => p(X) )
          & r(B,C)
          & s(B)
          & s(A) )
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( q(X,Y)
            & p(X) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(f_1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ~ q(X,Y)
          | ~ p(X) )
      & ! [X,Y] :
          ( q(X,Y)
          | ~ r(X,Y) )
      & ! [X] :
          ( p(X)
          | ~ s(X) )
      & r(B,C)
      & s(B)
      & s(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_7,U_6,U_5] :
      ( ! [U_4,U_3] :
          ( ~ q(U_4,U_3)
          | ~ p(U_4) )
      & ! [U_2,U_1] :
          ( q(U_2,U_1)
          | ~ r(U_2,U_1) )
      & ! [U_0] :
          ( p(U_0)
          | ~ s(U_0) )
      & r(U_6,U_5)
      & s(U_6)
      & s(U_7) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_7] : s(U_7)
    & ? [U_6] :
        ( ? [U_5] : r(U_6,U_5)
        & s(U_6) )
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( q(U_2,U_1)
        | ~ r(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_0] :
        ( p(U_0)
        | ~ s(U_0) )
    & ! [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] : ~ q(U_4,U_3)
        | ~ p(U_4) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_1_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_7] : s(U_7)
    & ? [U_5] : r(sK1,U_5)
    & s(sK1)
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( q(U_2,U_1)
        | ~ r(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_0] :
        ( p(U_0)
        | ~ s(U_0) )
    & ! [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] : ~ q(U_4,U_3)
        | ~ p(U_4) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_6,sK1)],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_1_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_7] : s(U_7)
    & r(sK1,sK2)
    & s(sK1)
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( q(U_2,U_1)
        | ~ r(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_0] :
        ( p(U_0)
        | ~ s(U_0) )
    & ! [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] : ~ q(U_4,U_3)
        | ~ p(U_4) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_5,sK2)],[f_1_5]) ).

fof(f_1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( s(sK3)
    & r(sK1,sK2)
    & s(sK1)
    & ! [U_2,U_1] :
        ( q(U_2,U_1)
        | ~ r(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_0] :
        ( p(U_0)
        | ~ s(U_0) )
    & ! [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] : ~ q(U_4,U_3)
        | ~ p(U_4) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_7,sK3)],[f_1_6]) ).

fof(f_1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( s(sK3)
    & r(sK1,sK2)
    & s(sK1)
    & ! [U_1,U_2] :
        ( q(U_2,U_1)
        | ~ r(U_2,U_1) )
    & ! [U_0] :
        ( p(U_0)
        | ~ s(U_0) )
    & ! [U_3,U_4] :
        ( ~ q(U_4,U_3)
        | ~ p(U_4) ) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(U_4,U_3)
    | ~ p(U_4) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(f_1_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(U_0)
    | ~ s(U_0) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(f_1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(U_2,U_1)
    | ~ r(U_2,U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(f_1_12,negated_conjecture,
    s(sK1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(f_1_13,negated_conjecture,
    r(sK1,sK2),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ( ~ q(sK1,sK2)
    | ~ p(sK1) ),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_1_9]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ s(sK1)
    | p(sK1) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_1_10]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    s(sK1),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_1_12]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( ~ r(sK1,sK2)
    | q(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:2)],[f_1_11]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t1:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    r(sK1,sK2),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_1_13]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 07:29:04 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------