↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:17 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.37s 3.60s
% Output   : Proof 3.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:22:08 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.37/3.60  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.37/3.60  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.37/3.60    (Not
% 3.37/3.60      (∀ (A B C : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60        And (And (And (And (s A) (s B)) (r B C)) (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X)) (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60          Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y)))
% 3.37/3.60    True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq
% 3.37/3.60    (∀ (A B C : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60      And (And (And (And (s A) (s B)) (r B C)) (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X)) (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60        Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y))
% 3.37/3.60    False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (Not
% 3.37/3.60        (∀ (B C : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60          And (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s B)) (r B C)) (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X)) (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60            Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y)))
% 3.37/3.60      True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (∀ (B C : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60        And (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s B)) (r B C)) (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X)) (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60          Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y))
% 3.37/3.60      False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (Not
% 3.37/3.60        (∀ (C : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60          And (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) C)) (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X))
% 3.37/3.60              (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60            Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y)))
% 3.37/3.60      True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (∀ (C : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60        And (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) C)) (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X))
% 3.37/3.60            (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60          Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y))
% 3.37/3.60      False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (Not
% 3.37/3.60        (And
% 3.37/3.60            (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)))
% 3.37/3.60              (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X))
% 3.37/3.60            (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60          Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y)))
% 3.37/3.60      True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (And
% 3.37/3.60          (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)))
% 3.37/3.60            (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X))
% 3.37/3.60          (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) →
% 3.37/3.60        Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y))
% 3.37/3.60      False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (And
% 3.37/3.60        (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)))
% 3.37/3.60          (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X))
% 3.37/3.60        (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y))
% 3.37/3.60      True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #9 (by clausification #[7]): Eq (Exists fun X => Exists fun Y => And (p X) (q X Y)) False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #10 (by clausification #[8]): Eq (∀ (X Y : Iota), r X Y → q X Y) True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #11 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.37/3.60    Eq
% 3.37/3.60      (And (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)))
% 3.37/3.60        (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X))
% 3.37/3.60      True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), r a Y → q a Y) True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (r a a_1 → q a a_1) True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (r a a_1) False) (Eq (q a a_1) True)
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #15 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Y => And (p a) (q a Y)) False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (And (p a) (q a a_1)) False
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a) False) (Eq (q a a_1) False)
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #18 (by clausification #[11]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), s X → p X) True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #19 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (And (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2))) True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #20 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (s a → p a) True
% 3.37/3.60  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (s a) False) (Eq (p a) True)
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #22 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (r (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)) True
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #23 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (And (s (skS.0 0 a)) (s (skS.0 1 a a_1))) True
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #24 (by superposition #[22, 14]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (q (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)) True)
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #25 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (s (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #27 (by superposition #[25, 21]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True)
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #28 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (q (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 2 a a_1 a_2)) True
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #33 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (p (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #34 (by superposition #[33, 17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (q (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2) False)
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (q (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2) False
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #36 (by superposition #[35, 28]): Eq False True
% 3.37/3.61  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): False
% 3.37/3.61  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------