↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:36:23 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.33s 1.19s
% Output   : Proof 5.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  15   ~;   9   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   2 sgn  19   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f0,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ! [X,Y] :
            ( r(X,Y)
           => q(X,Y) )
        & ! [X] :
            ( s(X)
           => p(X) )
        & r(B,C)
        & s(B)
        & s(A) )
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( q(X,Y)
          & p(X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f0_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( ! [X,Y] :
              ( r(X,Y)
             => q(X,Y) )
          & ! [X] :
              ( s(X)
             => p(X) )
          & r(B,C)
          & s(B)
          & s(A) )
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( q(X,Y)
            & p(X) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f0]) ).

fof(f0_nnf,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ~ q(X,Y)
          | ~ p(X) )
      & ! [X,Y] :
          ( q(X,Y)
          | ~ r(X,Y) )
      & ! [X] :
          ( p(X)
          | ~ s(X) )
      & r(B,C)
      & s(B)
      & s(A) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f0_neg]) ).

fof(f0_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ~ q(X,Y)
        | ~ p(X) )
      & ( q(X,Y)
        | ~ r(X,Y) )
      & ( p(X)
        | ~ s(X) )
      & r(sk1,sk2)
      & s(sk1)
      & s(sk0) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk0,sk1,sk2])],[f0_nnf]) ).

cnf(c4,plain,
    ( q(X3,X4)
    | ~ r(X3,X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi4,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(r(X0,X1),true,q(X0,X1),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c4]) ).

cnf(c2,plain,
    r(sk1,sk2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi2,negated_conjecture,
    r(sk1,sk2) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c2]) ).

cnf(h2,plain,
    q(sk1,sk2) = true,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi4,hi2]) ).

cnf(c3,plain,
    ( p(X3)
    | ~ s(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi3,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(s(X0),true,p(X0),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c3]) ).

cnf(c1,plain,
    s(sk1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi1,negated_conjecture,
    s(sk1) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c1]) ).

cnf(h1,plain,
    p(sk1) = true,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi3,hi1]) ).

cnf(c5,plain,
    ( ~ q(X3,X4)
    | ~ p(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f0_sk]) ).

cnf(hi5,negated_conjecture,
    ifeq(p(X0),true,ifeq(q(X0,X1),true,false,true),true) = true,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c5]) ).

cnf(t0,plain,
    true = false,
    inference(hyper_resolution,[status(thm)],[hi5,h1,h2]) ).

cnf(t26,plain,
    false = true,
    inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t0]) ).

cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
    true != false,
    inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c5]) ).

cnf(g0_0,plain,
    true != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0,t26]) ).

cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:43:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 5.33/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.33/1.19  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------