↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:20:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.34s 12.34s
% Output   : Refutation 3.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   7 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (   2   ~;   0   |;  15   &;  39   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (  11 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0   ^;  18   !;   6   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(s_decl,type,
    s: $i > $o ).

thf(r_decl,type,
    r: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(p_decl,type,
    p: $i > $o ).

thf(q_decl,type,
    q: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( ( E @ ( D @ r ) )
           => ( E @ ( D @ q ) ) )
        & ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( D @ s )
           => ( D @ p ) )
        & ( C @ ( B @ r ) )
        & ( B @ s )
        & ( A @ s ) )
     => ? [D: $i,E: $i] :
          ( ( E @ ( D @ q ) )
          & ( D @ p ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
              ( ( E @ ( D @ r ) )
             => ( E @ ( D @ q ) ) )
          & ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( D @ s )
             => ( D @ p ) )
          & ( C @ ( B @ r ) )
          & ( B @ s )
          & ( A @ s ) )
       => ? [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( ( E @ ( D @ q ) )
            & ( D @ p ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ! [D: $i,E: $i] :
              ( ( E @ ( D @ r ) )
             => ( E @ ( D @ q ) ) )
          & ! [D: $i] :
              ( ( D @ s )
             => ( D @ p ) )
          & ( C @ ( B @ r ) )
          & ( B @ s )
          & ( A @ s ) )
       => ? [D: $i,E: $i] :
            ( ( E @ ( D @ q ) )
            & ( D @ p ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.20/10.48  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.20/10.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/10.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/10.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/10.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/10.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/10.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/10.48  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:54:16 UTC 2026
% 0.20/10.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/10.48  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/11.07  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.31/11.24  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (171ms). 
% 1.31/11.26  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.93/11.67  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.93/11.68  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.14/11.78  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.32/11.82  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.32/11.82  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.32/11.82  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.32/11.83  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.34/12.33  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.34/12.33  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.34/12.34  % Time passed: 1708ms (effective reasoning time: 1070ms)
% 3.34/12.34  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.34/12.34  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 3.34/12.34  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 3.34/12.34  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1708 ms resp. 1070 ms w/o parsing
% 3.34/12.37  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.34/12.37  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------