↑ Up

Twee---2.7.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:48:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.24s
% Output   : Proof 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN949+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.17  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.17  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:19:46 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.17  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.24  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.08/0.24  Axiom 1 (prove_this_1): s(b) = true.
% 0.08/0.24  Axiom 2 (prove_this_2): r(b, c) = true.
% 0.08/0.24  Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.08/0.24  Axiom 4 (prove_this_3): ifeq(s(X), true, p(X), true) = true.
% 0.08/0.24  Axiom 5 (prove_this_4): ifeq(r(X, Y), true, q(X, Y), true) = true.
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  Goal 1 (prove_this_5): tuple(p(X), q(X, Y)) = tuple(true, true).
% 0.08/0.24  The goal is true when:
% 0.08/0.24    X = b
% 0.08/0.24    Y = c
% 0.08/0.24  
% 0.08/0.24  Proof:
% 0.08/0.24    tuple(p(b), q(b, c))
% 0.08/0.24  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24    tuple(p(b), ifeq(true, true, q(b, c), true))
% 0.08/0.24  = { by axiom 2 (prove_this_2) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24    tuple(p(b), ifeq(r(b, c), true, q(b, c), true))
% 0.08/0.24  = { by axiom 5 (prove_this_4) }
% 0.08/0.24    tuple(p(b), true)
% 0.08/0.24  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24    tuple(ifeq(true, true, p(b), true), true)
% 0.08/0.24  = { by axiom 1 (prove_this_1) R->L }
% 0.08/0.24    tuple(ifeq(s(b), true, p(b), true), true)
% 0.08/0.24  = { by axiom 4 (prove_this_3) }
% 0.08/0.25    tuple(true, true)
% 0.08/0.25  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.08/0.25  
% 0.08/0.25  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------