↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN950+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:45:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.04s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  22   ~;  18   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0 sgn  22   !;   6   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( q(X2)
         => p(X2) )
     => ? [X3] :
          ( ( q(X3)
           => p(X1) )
          & ( p(X3)
           => p(X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ! [X2] :
            ( q(X2)
           => p(X2) )
       => ? [X3] :
            ( ( q(X3)
             => p(X1) )
            & ( p(X3)
             => p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( ~ q(X2)
          | p(X2) )
      & ! [X3] :
          ( ( q(X3)
            & ~ p(X1) )
          | ( p(X3)
            & ~ p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( ~ q(X3)
          | p(X3) )
      & ! [X2] :
          ( ( q(X2)
            & ~ p(X1) )
          | ( p(X2)
            & ~ p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ! [X3] :
        ( ~ q(X3)
        | p(X3) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ( q(X2)
          & ~ p(sK1) )
        | ( p(X2)
          & ~ p(sK0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ q(X3)
      | p(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( q(X2)
      | p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ p(sK1)
      | p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( q(X2)
      | ~ p(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK1)
    | ~ p(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(sK1)
    | ~ p(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( q(X0)
      | ~ p(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p(X0)
      | ~ p(sK1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( q(X0)
      | p(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p(X0)
      | ~ q(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ( q(sK0)
    | p(sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ( p(sK0)
    | ~ q(sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : q(X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_54,c_55,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    q(sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p(X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_54,c_53,c_55,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(sK1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_55,c_49,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_64]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN950+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:43:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.04/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.04/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.04/1.18  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.04/1.18  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.04/1.18  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Option_epr_non_horn_non_eq
% 1.04/1.18  % 
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.04/1.18  
% 1.04/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------