↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN962+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:19 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.55s 3.70s
% Output   : Proof 3.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SYN962+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:27:23 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.55/3.70  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.70  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not ((∀ (X : Iota), p X) → And (∀ (X : Iota), p X) (∀ (Y : Iota), p Y))) True
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq ((∀ (X : Iota), p X) → And (∀ (X : Iota), p X) (∀ (Y : Iota), p Y)) False
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), p X) True
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #3 (by clausification #[1]): Eq (And (∀ (X : Iota), p X) (∀ (Y : Iota), p Y)) False
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #4 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p a) True
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): Or (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), p X) False) (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), p Y) False)
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), p Y) False) (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 0 a))) True)
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 0 a))) True) (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 1 a_1))) True)
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (Not (p (skS.0 1 a))) True) (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a_1)) False)
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 0 a)) False) (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a_1)) False)
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #10 (by superposition #[9, 4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) False) (Eq False True)
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (p (skS.0 1 a)) False
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #12 (by superposition #[11, 4]): Eq False True
% 3.55/3.70  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): False
% 3.55/3.70  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------