↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SYN965+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:51:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.24s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  10   ~;  11   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 1-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   8 sgn   5   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
    ? [X3] :
      ( ( p(X3,X2)
       => ? [X4] : p(X4,X3) )
      & ( ( p(X1,X3)
          & p(X3,X1) )
       => p(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
      ! [X2] :
      ? [X3] :
        ( ( p(X3,X2)
         => ? [X4] : p(X4,X3) )
        & ( ( p(X1,X3)
            & p(X3,X1) )
         => p(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X9,X11,X12] :
      ( ( p(X9,X11)
        | p(X11,esk1_1(X9)) )
      & ( p(X11,X9)
        | p(X11,esk1_1(X9)) )
      & ( ~ p(X11,esk1_1(X9))
        | p(X11,esk1_1(X9)) )
      & ( p(X9,X11)
        | ~ p(X12,X11) )
      & ( p(X11,X9)
        | ~ p(X12,X11) )
      & ( ~ p(X11,esk1_1(X9))
        | ~ p(X12,X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(X1,esk1_1(X2))
    | ~ p(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2)
    | p(X2,esk1_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2)
    | ~ p(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,esk1_1(X2))
    | p(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    p(X1,esk1_1(X1)),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2)
    | p(X1,esk1_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SYN965+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.32  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 08:50:38 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.24/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.24/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.71  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------