↑ Up

LEO-II---2.3.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LEO-II---2.3.1
% Problem  : SYN965+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Oct  7 11:07:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.21s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   28
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  291 (  67 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  663 ( 204   ~;  94   |;  10   &; 345   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  122 (   0   ^; 107   !;  15   ?; 122   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_p,type,
    p: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(tp_sK1_SY4,type,
    sK1_SY4: $i > $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ? [Z: $i] :
    ! [X: $i] :
    ? [Y: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ Y @ X )
       => ? [W: $i] : ( p @ W @ Y ) )
      & ( ( ( p @ Z @ Y )
          & ( p @ Y @ Z ) )
       => ( p @ Y @ X ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ? [Z: $i] :
        ! [X: $i] :
        ? [Y: $i] :
          ( ( ( p @ Y @ X )
           => ? [W: $i] : ( p @ W @ Y ) )
          & ( ( ( p @ Z @ Y )
              & ( p @ Y @ Z ) )
           => ( p @ Y @ X ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    ( ( ? [Z: $i] :
        ! [X: $i] :
        ? [Y: $i] :
          ( ( ( p @ Y @ X )
           => ? [W: $i] : ( p @ W @ Y ) )
          & ( ( ( p @ Z @ Y )
              & ( p @ Y @ Z ) )
           => ( p @ Y @ X ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( ~ ? [Z: $i] :
          ! [X: $i] :
          ? [Y: $i] :
            ( ( ( p @ Y @ X )
             => ? [W: $i] : ( p @ W @ Y ) )
            & ( ( ( p @ Z @ Y )
                & ( p @ Y @ Z ) )
             => ( p @ Y @ X ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( ~ ? [Z: $i] :
          ! [X: $i] :
          ? [Y: $i] :
            ( ( ( p @ Y @ X )
             => ? [W: $i] : ( p @ W @ Y ) )
            & ( ( ( p @ Z @ Y )
                & ( p @ Y @ Z ) )
             => ( p @ Y @ X ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ( ( ~ ~ ! [SX0: $i] :
              ~ ! [SX1: $i] :
                  ~ ! [SX2: $i] :
                      ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SX2 @ SX1 )
                              | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                                    ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SX2 ) )
                          | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SX0 @ SX2 )
                                    | ~ ( p @ SX2 @ SX0 ) )
                              | ( p @ SX2 @ SX1 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ( ( ~ ! [SX0: $i] :
            ~ ! [SX1: $i] :
                ~ ! [SX2: $i] :
                    ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SX2 @ SX1 )
                            | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                                  ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SX2 ) )
                        | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SX0 @ SX2 )
                                  | ~ ( p @ SX2 @ SX0 ) )
                            | ( p @ SX2 @ SX1 ) ) ) )
    = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( ! [SX0: $i] :
          ~ ! [SX1: $i] :
              ~ ! [SX2: $i] :
                  ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SX2 @ SX1 )
                          | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                                ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SX2 ) )
                      | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SX0 @ SX2 )
                                | ~ ( p @ SX2 @ SX0 ) )
                          | ( p @ SX2 @ SX1 ) ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ! [SY4: $i] :
              ~ ! [SY5: $i] :
                  ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SY5 @ SY4 )
                          | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                                ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SY5 ) )
                      | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SY5 )
                                | ~ ( p @ SY5 @ SV1 ) )
                          | ( p @ SY5 @ SY4 ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY4: $i] :
            ~ ! [SY5: $i] :
                ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SY5 @ SY4 )
                        | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                              ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SY5 ) )
                    | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SY5 )
                              | ~ ( p @ SY5 @ SV1 ) )
                        | ( p @ SY5 @ SY4 ) ) ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ! [SY7: $i] :
              ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SY7 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
                      | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                            ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SY7 ) )
                  | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SY7 )
                            | ~ ( p @ SY7 @ SV1 ) )
                      | ( p @ SY7 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_neg,[status(esa)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ! [SY7: $i] :
            ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SY7 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
                    | ~ ! [SX3: $i] :
                          ~ ( p @ SX3 @ SY7 ) )
                | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SY7 )
                          | ~ ( p @ SY7 @ SV1 ) )
                    | ( p @ SY7 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
                  | ~ ! [SY9: $i] :
                        ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) )
              | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                        | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
                  | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
                | ~ ! [SY9: $i] :
                      ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) )
            | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                      | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
                | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) ) )
      = $false ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
            | ~ ! [SY9: $i] :
                  ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) )
        | ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                  | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
            | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
              | ~ ! [SY9: $i] :
                    ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
          | ~ ! [SY9: $i] :
                ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ! [SY9: $i] :
                ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ! [SY9: $i] :
              ~ ( p @ SY9 @ SV2 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
          | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i,SV3: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i,SV3: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false )
      | ( ( ~ ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                    | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
              | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
              | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
          | ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
          | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
                | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[29]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
              | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) ) )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ SV2 @ ( sK1_SY4 @ SV1 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
          | ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( ~ ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 ) )
        = $false )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_or_neg,[status(thm)],[37]) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV2: $i,SV1: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV1 @ SV2 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [SV3: $i,SV1: $i,SV2: $i] :
      ( ( ( p @ SV2 @ SV1 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ SV3 @ SV2 )
        = $false ) ),
    inference(extcnf_not_neg,[status(thm)],[39]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    $false = $true,
    inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[25,41,40,36,35,31]) ).

thf(43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN965+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.17  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Oct  6 17:30:24 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.17  Running leo --cores 7 --timeout 300 --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21   No.of.Axioms: 0
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21   Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21   Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21  ********************************
% 0.09/0.21  *   All subproblems solved!    *
% 0.09/0.21  ********************************
% 0.09/0.21  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:1,axioms:0,ps:0,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:299,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:42,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21  %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 0.09/0.21  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21  %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 0.09/0.21  %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 43 ****
% 0.09/0.21  %**** clause counter: 42 ****
% 0.09/0.21  
% 0.09/0.21  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:1,axioms:0,ps:0,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:false,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:299,atp_calls_frequency:5,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:42,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------