↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SYN976+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 09:28:45 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   3   ~;   2   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   1 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( ( f
          | g )
        & ! [X] :
            ( p(X)
            & q(X) ) )
     => q(A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ( ( f
            | g )
          & ! [X] :
              ( p(X)
              & q(X) ) )
       => q(A) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(2,plain,
    q(X0),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    q(sK1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    ~ q(sK1),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[prove_this_negated]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ~ q(sK1),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SYN976+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul 22 18:52:49 EDT 2025
% 0.19/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.19/0.35  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------