↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN979+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:43:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  12   ~;   7   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2 sgn   8   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
    ? [X,Y] :
      ( ( s(A)
        & ( s(A)
         => p(X,Y) )
        & r(B)
        & r(A)
        & ( r(Y)
         => p(B,Y) )
        & q(B)
        & q(A)
        & ( q(X)
         => p(X,A) ) )
     => p(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
      ? [X,Y] :
        ( ( s(A)
          & ( s(A)
           => p(X,Y) )
          & r(B)
          & r(A)
          & ( r(Y)
           => p(B,Y) )
          & q(B)
          & q(A)
          & ( q(X)
           => p(X,A) ) )
       => p(A,B) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ p(A,B)
      & s(A)
      & ( p(X,Y)
        | ~ s(A) )
      & r(B)
      & r(A)
      & ( p(B,Y)
        | ~ r(Y) )
      & q(B)
      & q(A)
      & ( p(X,A)
        | ~ q(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_this_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ p(sK0,sK1)
      & s(sK0)
      & ( p(X,Y)
        | ~ s(sK0) )
      & r(sK1)
      & r(sK0)
      & ( p(sK1,Y)
        | ~ r(Y) )
      & q(sK1)
      & q(sK0)
      & ( p(X,sK0)
        | ~ q(X) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_1]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(A,B)
    | ~ s(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    s(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYN979+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.40  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:55:21 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.41  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.41  % Process 2440224 was started by sandbox2 on n002,
% 0.17/0.41  % Sat Sep 26 18:55:21 2026
% 0.17/0.41  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.41  
% 0.17/0.41  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.17/0.42  % Length of proof is 6.
% 0.17/0.42  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.17/0.42  % Maximum clause weight is 0.000.
% 0.17/0.42  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.17/0.42  
% 0.17/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------