↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SYN979+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:23:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.24s
% Output   : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   8 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  17   ~;  11   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  14   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
    ? [X2,X3] :
      ( ( ( q(X2)
         => p(X2,X0) )
        & q(X0)
        & q(X1)
        & ( r(X3)
         => p(X1,X3) )
        & r(X0)
        & r(X1)
        & ( s(X0)
         => p(X2,X3) )
        & s(X0) )
     => p(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
      ? [X2,X3] :
        ( ( ( q(X2)
           => p(X2,X0) )
          & q(X0)
          & q(X1)
          & ( r(X3)
           => p(X1,X3) )
          & r(X0)
          & r(X1)
          & ( s(X0)
           => p(X2,X3) )
          & s(X0) )
       => p(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ p(X0,X1)
      & ( p(X2,X0)
        | ~ q(X2) )
      & q(X0)
      & q(X1)
      & ( p(X1,X3)
        | ~ r(X3) )
      & r(X0)
      & r(X1)
      & ( p(X2,X3)
        | ~ s(X0) )
      & s(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ p(X0,X1)
      & ( p(X2,X0)
        | ~ q(X2) )
      & q(X0)
      & q(X1)
      & ( p(X1,X3)
        | ~ r(X3) )
      & r(X0)
      & r(X1)
      & ( p(X2,X3)
        | ~ s(X0) )
      & s(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( ~ s(sK0)
      | p(X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    s(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ~ p(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f15,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ! [X2,X3] : p(X2,X3) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X3] : p(X2,X3)
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> s(sK0) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f7,f18,f15]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f18]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f16,f13]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ~ spl2_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f23]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f21]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f22]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ~ spl2_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f24]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s2,s3]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN979+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 17:20:52 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.07/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.24  % (526313)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=4261447165:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-526313-526322"...
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)...printing done.
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.24  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.24  % (526322)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.07/0.24  % (526313)Success in time 0.024 s
% 0.07/0.24  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------