↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SYN980+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:43:30 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  18   ~;  14   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   4 sgn  16   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_this,conjecture,
    ! [B] :
      ( ! [Y] :
          ( ( r(B)
           => r(Y) )
         => p(f(Y),Y) )
     => ? [X,Y] :
          ( ( q(f(B),B)
           => q(X,Y) )
          & p(X,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(prove_this_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [B] :
        ( ! [Y] :
            ( ( r(B)
             => r(Y) )
           => p(f(Y),Y) )
       => ? [X,Y] :
            ( ( q(f(B),B)
             => q(X,Y) )
            & p(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_this]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ? [B] :
      ( ! [X,Y] :
          ( ( ~ q(X,Y)
            & q(f(B),B) )
          | ~ p(X,Y) )
      & ! [X0] :
          ( p(f(X0),X0)
          | ( ~ r(X0)
            & r(B) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_this_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( ~ q(X,Y)
          & q(f(sK0),sK0) )
        | ~ p(X,Y) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( p(f(X0),X0)
        | ( ~ r(X0)
          & r(sK0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_prove_this_neg,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ q(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ p(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( q(f(sK0),sK0)
        | ~ p(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( p(f(VAR_0),VAR_0)
        | ~ r(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( p(f(VAR_0),VAR_0)
        | r(sK0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(A),A)
    | ~ r(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(A),A)
    | r(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(f(sK0),sK0)
    | ~ p(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q(A,B)
    | ~ p(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_this_neg]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(f(sK0),sK0)
    | ~ p(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(f(A),A)
    | p(f(sK0),sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ~ p(f(sK0),sK0),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_6]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    p(f(sK0),sK0),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_7]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN980+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.42  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 18:56:00 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.16/0.42  % Process 529635 was started by sandbox2 on n015,
% 0.16/0.42  % Sat Sep 26 18:56:00 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.16/0.44  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.16/0.44  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.16/0.44  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.16/0.44  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------