↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : SYN981+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:21:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 5.49s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SYN981+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/5.46  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.17/5.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/5.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/5.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/5.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/5.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/5.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/5.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:35:27 UTC 2026
% 0.17/5.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/5.47  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.17/5.49  % Refutation found
% 0.17/5.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.17/5.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.17/5.49    ( ( (! [X] :( p(X)=> q(X) ))& (? [Y] :( q(Y)=> r(Y) ) ))=> (? [Z] :( p(Z)=> r(Z) ) )) ),
% 0.17/5.49    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.17/5.49    ~(( ( (! [X] :( p(X)=> q(X) ))& (? [Y] :( q(Y)=> r(Y) ) ))=> (? [Z] :( p(Z)=> r(Z) ) )) )),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f3,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    (((![X]: (~p(X)|q(X)))&(?[Y]: (~q(Y)|r(Y))))&(![Z]: (p(Z)&~r(Z))))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f4,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ((![X]: (~p(X)|q(X)))&((?[Y]: ~q(Y))|(?[Y]: r(Y))))&((![Z]: p(Z))&(![Z]: ~r(Z)))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f5,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ((![X]: (~p(X)|q(X)))&(~q(sK0_skl)|r(sK1_skl)))&((![Z]: p(Z))&(![Z]: ~r(Z)))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0_skl,sK1_skl]),skolemize(Y,sK0_skl),skolemize(Y,sK1_skl)],[f4])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f6,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ![X0]: (~p(X0)|q(X0))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f7,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ~q(sK0_skl)|r(sK1_skl)),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f8,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ![X0]: (p(X0))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f9,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ![X0]: (~r(X0))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f10,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    ![X0]: (q(X0))),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f6,f8])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f11,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    r(sK1_skl)),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f7,f10])).
% 0.17/5.49  fof(f12,plain,(
% 0.17/5.49    $false),
% 0.17/5.49    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f11,f9])).
% 0.17/5.49  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/5.52  % Elapsed time: 0.046747 seconds
% 0.23/5.52  % CPU time: 0.133269 seconds
% 0.23/5.52  % Total memory used: 20.729 MB
% 0.23/5.52  % Net memory used: 20.477 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------