%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN988^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:41:06 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 1 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 1 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 ^; 3 !; 0 ?; 3 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(thm,axiom,
! [X1: $o] : ~ X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2tn1j4pAU0/E---3.1_2867337.p',thm) ).
thf(c_0_1,plain,
! [X1: $o] : ~ X1,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm]) ).
thf(c_0_2,plain,
! [X3: $o] : ~ X3,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN988^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.25 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.25 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.25 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.25 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.25 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:19:44 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.25 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.25 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.32 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2tn1j4pAU0/E---3.1_2867337.p
% 0.24/0.36 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.24/0.36 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.36 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % sh4l with pid 2867352 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Result found by sh4l
% 0.24/0.36 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.36 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.36 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.36 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.36 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2867356 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.36 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.36 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.36 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.36 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.36 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.36 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.36 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.36
% 0.24/0.36 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.36 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.36 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.36 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.24/0.36 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.36 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.24/0.36 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.36 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.36 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.36 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.36 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.36 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.36 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.36 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.36 % Termbank termtop insertions : 28
% 0.24/0.36 % Search garbage collected termcells : 6
% 0.24/0.36
% 0.24/0.36 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.36 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.36 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.36 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.36 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.24/0.36
% 0.24/0.36 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.36 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.36 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.36 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.36 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.36 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------