↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN989^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:23 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.07s 4.25s
% Output   : Proof 4.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN989^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:18:08 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.07/4.25  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.07/4.25  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X : Prop), Or X (Not X))) True
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (∀ (X : Prop), Or X (Not X)) False
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (Not (Or (skS.0 0 a) (Not (skS.0 0 a)))) True
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (Or (skS.0 0 a) (Not (skS.0 0 a))) False
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (Not (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (skS.0 0 a) False
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #6 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (skS.0 0 a) True
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #7 (by identity loobHoist #[6]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 True) True) (Eq a False)
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #9 (by falseElim #[7]): Eq (skS.0 0 True) True
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #10 (by identity loobHoist #[5]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 0 True) False) (Eq a False)
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #12 (by superposition #[10, 9]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq a False) (Eq False True)
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq a False
% 4.07/4.25  Clause #15 (by falseElim #[13]): False
% 4.07/4.25  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------