%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : E---3.5.1 % Problem : SYN989_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:31:04 PM UTC 2026 % Result : Satisfiable 0.24s 0.54s % Output : Saturation 0.24s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SYN989_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0. % 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % 0.24/0.48 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.24/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.24/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.24/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.24/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.24/0.48 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.24/0.48 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.24/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:37:54 UTC 2026 % 0.24/0.48 % CPUTime : % 0.24/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM % 0.24/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving % 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.24/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1 % 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2324250 completed with status 1 % 0.24/0.54 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN % 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.24/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) % 0.24/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied % 0.24/0.54 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN % 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total) % 0.24/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2324257 completed with status 1 % 0.24/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack % 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. % 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total) % 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores % 0.24/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) % 0.24/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied % 0.24/0.54 % Search class: FUUPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN % 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total) % 0.24/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores % 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s % 0.24/0.54 % 0.24/0.54 % No proof found! % 0.24/0.54 % SZS status Satisfiable % 0.24/0.54 % SZS output start Saturation % 0.24/0.54 % SZS output end Saturation % 0.24/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 1 % 0.24/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Initial clauses : 1 % 0.24/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 % 0.24/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Processed clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...subsumed : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Generated clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Paramodulations : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Factorizations : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % NegExts : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...of those cached : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 % 0.24/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 % 0.24/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 % 0.24/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 % 0.24/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 % 0.24/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 % 0.24/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0 % 0.24/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 38 % 0.24/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3 % 0.24/0.54 % 0.24/0.54 % ------------------------------------------------- % 0.24/0.54 % User time : 0.003 s % 0.24/0.54 % System time : 0.001 s % 0.24/0.54 % Total time : 0.004 s % 0.24/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages % 0.24/0.54 % 0.24/0.54 % ------------------------------------------------- % 0.24/0.54 % User time : 0.006 s % 0.24/0.54 % System time : 0.008 s % 0.24/0.54 % Total time : 0.015 s % 0.24/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages % 0.24/0.54 % E exiting %------------------------------------------------------------------------------