%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN991^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:41:27 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 2 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 0 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 11 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 12 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 2 ^; 9 !; 0 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
refl: ( $i > $i > $o ) > $o ).
thf(refl,axiom,
( refl
= ( ^ [X1: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QxHlNY6ag1/E---3.1_1867377.p',refl) ).
thf(ax,axiom,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o] : ( refl @ X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QxHlNY6ag1/E---3.1_1867377.p',ax) ).
thf(c_0_2,plain,
( refl
= ( ^ [Z0: $i > $i > $o] :
! [X2: $i] : ( Z0 @ X2 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[refl]) ).
thf(c_0_3,plain,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X4: $i] : ( X1 @ X4 @ X4 ),
inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax,c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
! [X5: $i > $i > $o,X6: $i] : ( X5 @ X6 @ X6 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
thf(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1: $i > $i > $o,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 @ X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
$false,
inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN991^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.16 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.16 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.16 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.16 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.16 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.16 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.16 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:20:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.16 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.16 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.20 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.21 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QxHlNY6ag1/E---3.1_1867377.p
% 0.09/0.23 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.23 % partial match(1): HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHFN.
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % new_ho_10 with pid 1867404 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.09/0.23 % partial match(1): HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHFN.
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.23 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.23 % Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SHFFMMBN
% 0.09/0.23 % partial match(2): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_ho_10 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting sh5l with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_bool_1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_bool_2 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % new_ho_10 with pid 1867412 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.09/0.23 % partial match(1): HSSSSMSSSLSNFFN
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNHFN.
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.23 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.23 % Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SHFFMMBN
% 0.09/0.23 % partial match(2): HUUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
% 0.09/0.23 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Starting new_ho_10 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.23 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.23
% 0.09/0.23 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.23 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.23 % Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.09/0.23 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Initial clauses : 2
% 0.09/0.23 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.09/0.23 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.09/0.23 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.23 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.23 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Condensation attempts : 1
% 0.09/0.23 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.23 % Termbank termtop insertions : 89
% 0.09/0.23 % Search garbage collected termcells : 18
% 0.09/0.23
% 0.09/0.23 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.23 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.23 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Maximum resident set size: 3568 pages
% 0.09/0.23
% 0.09/0.23 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.23 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.23 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.09/0.23 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.09/0.23 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------