↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SYN996^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:51:42 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.30s 1.23s
% Output   : Refutation 0.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  13 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (   9   ~;   0   |;   2   &;  54   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0   ^;  16   !;  12   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_0,type,
    r: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: ( $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( r @ X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ( ( r @ X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
        = $true )
    & ! [X2: $i > $i] :
        ( ( r @ ( sK1 @ X2 ) @ ( X2 @ ( sK1 @ X2 ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( r @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
     => ( ( r @ X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ? [X3: $i] :
          ( ( r @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
         != $true )
     => ( ( r @ ( sK1 @ X2 ) @ ( X2 @ ( sK1 @ X2 ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
      ? [X1: $i] :
        ( ( r @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
    & ! [X2: $i > $i] :
      ? [X3: $i] :
        ( ( r @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] :
          ( ( r @ X0 @ X1 )
          = $true )
     => ? [X2: $i > $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] :
          ( ( r @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] : ( r @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ? [X2: $i > $i] :
        ! [X3: $i] : ( r @ X3 @ ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: $i] :
        ? [X1: $i] : ( r @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ? [X2: $i > $i] :
        ! [X0: $i] : ( r @ X0 @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ( ! [X0: $i] :
      ? [X1: $i] : ( r @ X0 @ X1 )
   => ? [X2: $i > $i] :
      ! [X0: $i] : ( r @ X0 @ ( X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Z7IqIVT9dr/DTF2THF_24922.p',conj) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X2: $i > $i] :
      ( ( r @ ( sK1 @ X2 ) @ ( X2 @ ( sK1 @ X2 ) ) )
     != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYN996^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 14:22:05 EST 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  % File     : SYN996^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.30/0.46  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.30/0.46  % Problem  : Test for naive Skolemization
% 0.30/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.30/0.46  % English  :
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Refs     : [BB05]  Benzmueller & Brown (2005), A Structured Set of Higher
% 0.30/0.46  %          : [Ben09] Benzmueller (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.46  % Source   : [Ben09]
% 0.30/0.46  % Names    : Example 4 [BB05]
% 0.30/0.46  %          : choice2 [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.46  %          : Without choice : CounterSatisfiable
% 0.30/0.46  % Rating   : 0.25 v9.0.0, 0.17 v8.2.0, 0.18 v8.1.0, 0.17 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.3.0, 0.20 v7.2.0, 0.12 v7.1.0, 0.14 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.50 v6.1.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.20 v5.4.0, 0.25 v4.1.0, 0.33 v4.0.1, 1.00 v3.7.0
% 0.30/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    2 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   2 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of connectives :    6 (   0   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   5   @)
% 0.30/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   6 avg)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    3 (   3   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   2   !;   2   ?;   4   :)
% 0.30/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  % Comments : 
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  thf(r_decl,type,
% 0.30/0.46      r: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.46      ( ! [X: $i] :
% 0.30/0.46        ? [Y: $i] : ( r @ X @ Y )
% 0.30/0.46     => ? [F: $i > $i] :
% 0.30/0.46        ! [X: $i] : ( r @ X @ ( F @ X ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.46  
% 0.30/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.46  ------------------------
% 0.30/1.20  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 0.30/1.20  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 0.30/1.20  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 14:22:06 EST 2026
% 0.30/1.20  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 0.30/1.20  %%% Logic specification used:
% 0.30/1.20  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 0.30/1.20  
% 0.30/1.20  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Z7IqIVT9dr/DTF2DTF24922.p
% See solution above
% 0.30/1.20  ------------------------
% 0.30/1.21  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 0.30/1.21  thf(r_decl,type,
% 0.30/1.21      r: $i > $i > $o ).
% 0.30/1.21  
% 0.30/1.21  thf(conj,conjecture,
% 0.30/1.21      ( ! [X: $i] :
% 0.30/1.21        ? [Y: $i] : ( r @ X @ Y )
% 0.30/1.21     => ? [F: $i > $i] :
% 0.30/1.21        ! [X: $i] : ( r @ X @ ( F @ X ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/1.21  ------------------------
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_24922 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 0.30/1.23  % (25212)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_24922 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)First to succeed.
% 0.30/1.23  % (25212)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.30/1.23  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_24922
% 0.30/1.23  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_24922
% 0.30/1.23  thf(func_def_0, type, r: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: $i > $i).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: ($i > $i) > $i).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(func_def_7, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f16,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    $false),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ($true != $true)),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f10,f11])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((r @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ! [X0 : $i] : ((r @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true) & ! [X2 : $i > $i] : ((r @ (sK1 @ X2) @ (X2 @ (sK1 @ X2))) != $true)),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ! [X0 : $i] : (? [X1 : $i] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ((r @ X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)) = $true))),
% 0.30/1.23    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ! [X2 : $i > $i] : (? [X3 : $i] : ((r @ X3 @ (X2 @ X3)) != $true) => ((r @ (sK1 @ X2) @ (X2 @ (sK1 @ X2))) != $true))),
% 0.30/1.23    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ! [X0 : $i] : ? [X1 : $i] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true) & ! [X2 : $i > $i] : ? [X3 : $i] : ((r @ X3 @ (X2 @ X3)) != $true)),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ? [X1 : $i] : ((r @ X0 @ X1) = $true) => ? [X2 : $i > $i] : ! [X3 : $i] : ((r @ X3 @ (X2 @ X3)) = $true))),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f4,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ? [X1 : $i] : (r @ X0 @ X1) => ? [X2 : $i > $i] : ! [X3 : $i] : (r @ X3 @ (X2 @ X3)))),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.30/1.23    ~(! [X0 : $i] : ? [X1 : $i] : (r @ X0 @ X1) => ? [X2 : $i > $i] : ! [X0 : $i] : (r @ X0 @ (X2 @ X0)))),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 0.30/1.23    ! [X0 : $i] : ? [X1 : $i] : (r @ X0 @ X1) => ? [X2 : $i > $i] : ! [X0 : $i] : (r @ X0 @ (X2 @ X0))),
% 0.30/1.23    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Z7IqIVT9dr/DTF2THF_24922.p',conj)).
% 0.30/1.23  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.30/1.23    ( ! [X2 : $i > $i] : (((r @ (sK1 @ X2) @ (X2 @ (sK1 @ X2))) != $true)) )),
% 0.30/1.23    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 0.30/1.23  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_24922
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.30/1.23  
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.23  % (25211)------------------------------
% 0.30/1.23  % (25209)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------